Premium
Methods for evaluating human impact on soil microorganisms based on their activity, biomass, and diversity in agricultural soils
Author(s) -
Joergensen Rainer Georg,
Emmerling Christoph
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
journal of plant nutrition and soil science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.644
H-Index - 87
eISSN - 1522-2624
pISSN - 1436-8730
DOI - 10.1002/jpln.200521941
Subject(s) - environmental science , biomass (ecology) , soil water , tillage , mineralization (soil science) , agronomy , microorganism , microbial population biology , soil organic matter , environmental chemistry , biology , chemistry , soil science , bacteria , genetics
The present review is focused on microbiological methods used in agricultural soils accustomed to human disturbance. Recent developments in soil biology are analyzed with the aim of highlighting gaps in knowledge, unsolved research questions, and controversial results. Activity rates (basal respiration, N mineralization) and biomass are used as overall indices for assessing microbial functions in soil and can be supplemented by biomass ratios (C : N, C : P, and C : S) and eco‐physiological ratios (soil organic C : microbial‐biomass C, q CO 2 , q N min ). The community structure can be characterized by functional groups of the soil microbial biomass such as fungi and bacteria, Gram‐negative and Gram‐positive bacteria, or by biotic diversity. Methodological aspects of soil microbial indices are assessed, such as sampling, pretreatment of samples, and conversion factors of data into biomass values. Microbial‐biomass C (µg (g soil) –1 ) can be estimated by multiplying total PLFA (nmol (g soil) –1 ) by the F PLFA ‐factor of 5.8 and DNA (µg (g soil) –1 ) by the F DNA ‐factor of 6.0. In addition, the turnover of the soil microbial biomass is appreciated as a key process for maintaining nutrient cycles in soil. Examples are briefly presented that show the direction of human impact on soil microorganisms by the methods evaluated. These examples are taken from research on organic farming, reduced tillage, de‐intensification of land‐use management, degradation of peatland, slurry application, salinization, heavy‐metal contamination, lignite deposition, pesticide application, antibiotics, TNT, and genetically modified plants.