z-logo
Premium
Adding dissolved organic carbon to simulate freeze‐thaw related N 2 O emissions from soil
Author(s) -
Sehy Ulrike,
Dyckmans Jens,
Ruser Reiner,
Munch Jean Charles
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
journal of plant nutrition and soil science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.644
H-Index - 87
eISSN - 1522-2624
pISSN - 1436-8730
DOI - 10.1002/jpln.200421393
Subject(s) - dissolved organic carbon , chemistry , soil water , environmental chemistry , denitrification , nitrate , total organic carbon , nitrogen , soil science , environmental science , organic chemistry
It has been assumed that high winter N 2 O emissions from soils are the result of increased amounts of microbially available organic C liberated during freezing and metabolized during subsequent thawing. In a laboratory experiment, we attempted to simulate freeze‐thaw events by adding dissolved organic C (DOC) to sieved soil of high water content (95% water‐filled pore space). In a full factorial design, CO 2 and N 2 O emissions of a) soil samples provided with DOC extracted from frozen soil and b) soil samples frozen for 46 days and thawed were compared. Additionally, NO $_3^-$ , DOC and microbial ATP contents of all treatments were repeatedly analyzed during the experiment. The addition of DOC to unfrozen soil (–F+C) resulted in a substantial (22‐fold) increase in N 2 O emissions as compared to the control (–F–C). However, following thawing, the increase in N 2 O emissions was much larger (828‐fold in +F–C and 1243‐fold in +F+C). Freezing, but not the addition of DOC led to increased CO 2 emissions. Neither treatment affected microbial adenylate content. By adding 15 N‐labeled nitrate to the soil samples, the main process leading to elevated N 2 O flux rates after both DOC addition and freeze‐thaw treatment was identified as denitrification. We conclude that the availability of C substrate plays an important role for freeze‐thaw‐related N 2 O emissions. However, the fact that the simulated treatment and the freeze‐thaw treatment yielded significantly different amounts of N 2 O suggests that both quantity and quality of available C differed between the treatments. The localization of the liberated substrate, i.e. , the availability in situ , seems to be of major importance for the amount of N 2 O produced.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom