Premium
Well‐maintained patients with a history of periodontitis still harbor a more dysbiotic microbiome than health
Author(s) -
Lu Hongye,
He Lu,
Xu Jingling,
Song Wenli,
Feng Xianghui,
Zhao Yibing,
Meng Huanxin
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of periodontology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.036
H-Index - 156
eISSN - 1943-3670
pISSN - 0022-3492
DOI - 10.1002/jper.19-0498
Subject(s) - microbiome , periodontitis , actinomyces , dysbiosis , biology , fusobacteria , fusobacterium , bleeding on probing , chronic periodontitis , capnocytophaga , clinical attachment loss , oral microbiome , microbiology and biotechnology , veillonella , dentistry , streptococcus , medicine , bacteroides , 16s ribosomal rna , bacteria , firmicutes , bioinformatics , genetics
Background It remains unclear whether well‐maintained subjects, with periodontitis in the past, effectively treated, and maintained for a long time, have the same subgingival microbiome as healthy subjects. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the characteristics of the subgingival microbiome in well‐maintained patients with a history of periodontitis compared with healthy subjects. Methods We recruited in 17 well‐maintained individuals (no evidence of clinical inflammation and progress of periodontitis) and 21 healthy individuals. Periodontal clinical parameters, consisting of missing teeth, plaque index (PLI), periodontal depth (PD), and bleeding index (BI), were recorded and analyzed. The pooled subgingival samples from mesiobuccal sites of two maxillary first molars were collected. The V3‐V4 region of 16S rRNA gene from 38 subgingival samples was sequenced and analyzed. Alpha diversity, microbial composition, types of bacteria, functional pathways between well‐maintained group and health group were compared using Mann‐Whitney U test. Spearman correlation was used in analyzing the symbiotic relationship among taxa. A classification model was constructed to distinguish two ecological types. Results The maintained individuals demonstrated a different microbiome from healthy subjects, with higher diversity, more disordered structure, more pathogenic microbiota, and more host‐destructive metabolism pathways. The genera Actinomyces , Streptococcus , Leptotrichia , Capnocytophaga , Lautropia , and Fusobacterium were predominant components with relative abundance >5% in the subgingival microbiome of well‐maintained patients. The classification model by microbiota got a remarkable accuracy of 83.33%. Conclusions Individuals with well‐maintained periodontitis showed a more dysbiotic microbial community than healthy individuals. Therefore, close monitoring and scheduled maintenance treatment are necessary for them to maintain a healthy periodontal condition.