Premium
Effect of graft positioning on dissipated energy in knee osteochondral autologous transplantation—A biomechanical study
Author(s) -
Walter Christian,
Trappe Dominik,
Beck Alexander,
Jacob Christopher,
Hofmann Ulf Krister
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of orthopaedic research®
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.041
H-Index - 155
eISSN - 1554-527X
pISSN - 0736-0266
DOI - 10.1002/jor.24612
Subject(s) - transplantation , condyle , cartilage , medicine , biomedical engineering , materials science , femur , anatomy , orthodontics , surgery
Abstract Focal cartilage defects can be treated by osteochondral autologous transplantation (OAT). High congruence of the graft with the surrounding cartilage structure is essential for a good clinical outcome, but can not always be achieved. We recently established a method to measure dissipated energy (DE) as a friction parameter in knee joints. We now investigated how autograft harvesting and implant positioning affect the DE during knee motion. Six sheep knee joints were cyclically motioned under 400 N axial load. During the cyclic motion, the flexion angle and the respective torque were recorded and the DE was calculated. Several experimental conditions were tested: first, the DE was measured after approach had been performed (“native”). Subsequently, a cylinder was removed from the medial femur condyles and a donor cylinder was inserted from an unloaded site in four different transplant positions: even, 1 mm deeper, 1 mm higher, and flush without cartilage (defect). No significant changes in friction were observed between the native knee and an even or deep OAT positioning. We, however, found a small but significant increase in DE between the “native” and “1 mm high” formations (ΔDE compared with native = 14 mJ/cycle; P = .004 after data normalization) and a large increase in defect situation (ΔDE compared with native = 119 mJ/cycle; P = .001). Considering the long‐term therapeutic aim that is pursued when performing OAT, elevated graft positioning should clearly be avoided. From a biomechanical point of view, donor site morbidity after cylinder harvest can be neglected.