Premium
Bi‐Cruciate Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty Does Not Restore Native Tibiofemoral Articular Contact Kinematics During Gait
Author(s) -
Tsai TsungYuan,
Liow Ming Han Lincoln,
Li Guoan,
Arauz Paul,
Peng Yun,
Klemt Christian,
Kwon YoungMin
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of orthopaedic research®
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.041
H-Index - 155
eISSN - 1554-527X
pISSN - 0736-0266
DOI - 10.1002/jor.24333
Subject(s) - medicine , kinematics , sagittal plane , condyle , gait , orthodontics , coronal plane , range of motion , knee joint , gait cycle , physical medicine and rehabilitation , anatomy , surgery , physics , classical mechanics
Bi‐cruciate retaining (BCR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) design preserves both anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments with the potential to restore normal posterior femoral rollback and joint kinematics. Abnormal knee kinematics and “paradoxical” anterior femoral translation in conventional TKA designs have been suggested as potential causes of patient dissatisfaction. However, there is a paucity of data on the in vivo kinematics and articular contact behavior of BCR‐TKA. This study aimed to investigate in vivo kinematics, articular contact position, and pivot point location of the BCR‐TKA during gait. In vivo kinematics of 30 patients with unilateral BCR‐TKA during treadmill walking was determined using validated dual fluoroscopic imaging tracking technique. The BCR‐TKA exhibited less extension than the normal healthy knee between heel strike and 48% of gait cycle. Although the average external rotation trend observed for BCR TKA was similar to the normal healthy knee, the range of motion was not fully comparable. The lowest point of the medial condyle showed longer anteroposterior translation excursion than the lateral condyle, leading to a lateral‐pivoting pattern in 60% of BCR TKA patients during stance phase. BCR‐TKA demonstrated no statistical significant differences in anterior–posterior translation as well as varus rotation, when compared to normal healthy knees during the stance phase. However, sagittal plane motion and tibiofemoral articular contact characteristics including pivoting patterns were not fully restored in BCR TKA patients during gait, suggesting that BCR TKA does not restore native tibiofemoral articular contact kinematics. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 37:1929–1937, 2019