Premium
Rotator cuff healing using demineralized cancellous bone matrix sponge interposition compared to standard repair in a preclinical canine model
Author(s) -
Smith Matthew J.,
Pfeiffer Ferris M.,
Cook Cristi R.,
Kuroki Keiichi,
Cook James L.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
journal of orthopaedic research®
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.041
H-Index - 155
eISSN - 1554-527X
pISSN - 0736-0266
DOI - 10.1002/jor.23680
Subject(s) - demineralized bone matrix , dbm , rotator cuff , medicine , bone healing , platelet rich plasma , shoulders , magnetic resonance imaging , surgery , tendon , radiology , amplifier , platelet , cmos , electronic engineering , engineering
This Level II study assessed clinically relevant outcomes for repair of large, retracted infraspinatus tendons (ISTs) using a demineralized bone matrix (DBM) sponge (FlexiGraft) hydrated in platelet‐rich plasma (PRP) versus direct repair in a validated canine model. Adult research dogs ( n = 10) were used. The IST was transected in each shoulder ( n = 20) and randomized to direct repair or repair with DBM‐PRP interposition at 4 weeks posttransection. At 12 weeks postrepair, dogs were sacrificed, and the repair evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), histology, and biomechanical testing. MRI and histology scores were significantly ( p < 0.05) better in the DBM‐PRP shoulders. Biomechanical testing revealed significantly improved strength of the DBM‐PRP repairs at 5 and 10 mm of displacement, as well as for ultimate failure load. In this canine model of retracted IST repair, DBM‐PRP sponge hydrated in PRP was considered safe and effective. In addition, use of DBM‐PRP was associated with improved MRI and histologic appearance, and improved strength compared to direct repair. Clinical significance: Based on reported failure rates for repair of large, retracted rotator cuff tears, improving tendon‐to‐bone healing is critical. Use of DBM combined with PRP shows potential for addressing this critical clinical need. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:906–912, 2018.