z-logo
Premium
Use of a new model allowing controlled uniaxial loading to evaluate tendon healing in a bone tunnel
Author(s) -
Rodeo Scott A.,
Voigt Clifford,
Ma Richard,
Solic John,
Stasiak Mark,
Ju Xiaodong,
ElAmin Saddiq,
Deng XiangHua
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of orthopaedic research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.041
H-Index - 155
eISSN - 1554-527X
pISSN - 0736-0266
DOI - 10.1002/jor.23087
Subject(s) - bone healing , tendon , materials science , orthodontics , biomedical engineering , structural engineering , engineering , medicine , surgery
The optimal mechanical loading regimen for the healing of a tendon graft in a bone tunnel is unknown. We developed a rat model that directly tensions a healing tendon graft, without the use of confounding joint motion. Fifty cycles of either 0, 3, or 6 N of tension were applied to groups daily for 3 or 6 weeks. At 3 weeks the low load (3 N) group had the highest failure load ( p  = 0.009), but by 6 weeks there were no differences in failure load among groups. At 3 weeks the high load (6 N) group had greater osteoclast activity compared to the immobilized (0 N) group ( p  < 0.05), and by 6 weeks there were significantly more osteoclasts in the high load group compared to the low load group ( p  = 0.01). Bone volume fraction was higher in the immobilized group compared to the 3 N load group at 3 weeks ( p  = 0.014) and 6 weeks ( p  = 0.007). At 6 weeks, the immobilized group had greater trabecular number compared to both loading groups ( p  < 0.05). In conclusion, low magnitude loading had a beneficial early effect but continued loading led to poorer new bone formation over time and no beneficial effect at 6 weeks, perhaps due to delayed maturation from cumulative loads. © 2015 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 34:852–859, 2016.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here