Premium
Static and dynamic compression application and removal on the intervertebral discs of growing rats
Author(s) -
Ménard AnneLaure,
Grimard Guy,
Massol Elise,
Londono Irène,
Moldovan Florina,
Villemure Isabelle
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of orthopaedic research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.041
H-Index - 155
eISSN - 1554-527X
pISSN - 0736-0266
DOI - 10.1002/jor.22991
Subject(s) - compression (physics) , proteoglycan , intervertebral disc , annulus (botany) , nucleus , dynamic range compression , biomedical engineering , dynamic loading , materials science , chemistry , anatomy , medicine , composite material , biology , neuroscience , cartilage
Fusionless implants are used to correct pediatric progressive spinal deformities, most of them spanning the intervertebral disc. This study aimed at investigating the effects of in vivo static versus dynamic compression application and removal on discs of growing rats. A microloading device applied compression. 48 immature rats (28 d.o.) were divided into two groups (43d, 53d). Each group included four subgroups: control (no surgery), sham (device installed without loading), static (0.2 MPa) and dynamic compressions (0.2 MPa ± 30% with 0.1 Hz). In 43d subgroups, compression was applied for 15 days. In 53d subgroups, compression was followed by 10 days without loading. Disc heights, nucleus/annulus volumetric proportions and nucleus proteoglycan contents were analyzed using one‐way ANOVA and post‐hoc Tukey comparisons ( p < 0.05). Disc heights of 43d and 53d static and dynamic loading rats were lower than shams ( p < 0.05). Volumetric proportions remained similar. At 43d, nucleus proteoglycan contents increased in both static and dynamic loading rats. However, at 53d, static loading rats had lower proteoglycan content than dynamic loading rats ( p < 0.05). Disc structure is altered following static compression removal, but nucleus proteoglycan content remaining elevated in dynamic group. Dynamic fusionless implants would better preserve disc integrity. © 2015 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 34:290–298, 2016.