Premium
Cement augmentation of implants—no general cure in osteoporotic fracture treatment. A biomechanical study on non‐displaced femoral neck fractures
Author(s) -
HofmannFliri Ladina,
Nicolino Tomas I.,
Barla Jorge,
Gueorguiev Boyko,
Richards R. Geoff,
Blauth Michael,
Windolf Markus
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of orthopaedic research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.041
H-Index - 155
eISSN - 1554-527X
pISSN - 0736-0266
DOI - 10.1002/jor.22978
Subject(s) - cadaveric spasm , medicine , femoral neck , displacement (psychology) , femoral head , implant , fixation (population genetics) , orthodontics , biomechanics , dentistry , orthopedic surgery , surgery , osteoporosis , anatomy , psychology , population , environmental health , psychotherapist , endocrinology
Femoral neck fractures in the elderly are a common problem in orthopedics. Augmentation of screw fixation with bone cement can provide better stability of implants and lower the risk of secondary displacement. This study aimed to investigate whether cement augmentation of three cannulated screws in non‐displaced femoral neck fractures could increase implant fixation. A femoral neck fracture was simulated in six paired human cadaveric femora and stabilized with three 7.3 mm cannulated screws. Pairs were divided into two groups: conventional instrumentation versus additional cement augmentation of screw tips with 2 ml TraumacemV+ each. Biomechanical testing was performed by applying cyclic axial load until failure. Failure cycles, axial head displacement, screw angle changes, telescoping and screw cut‐out were evaluated. Failure (15 mm actuator displacement) occurred in the augmented group at 12,500 cycles (± 2,480) compared to 15,625 cycles (± 4,215) in the non‐augmented group ( p = 0.041). When comparing 3 mm vertical displacement of the head no significant difference ( p = 0.72) was detected between the survival curves of the two groups. At 8,500 load‐cycles (early onset failure) the augmented group demonstrated a change in screw angle of 2.85° (± 0.84) compared to 1.15° (± 0.93) in the non‐augmented group ( p = 0.013). The results showed no biomechanical advantage with respect to secondary displacement following augmentation of three cannulated screws in a non‐displaced femoral neck fracture. Consequently, the indication for cement augmentation to enhance implant anchorage in osteoporotic bone has to be considered carefully taking into account fracture type, implant selection and biomechanical surrounding. © 2015 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 34:314–319, 2016.