Premium
Quantitative comparison of the microscopic anatomy of the human ACL femoral and tibial entheses
Author(s) -
Beaulieu Mélanie L.,
Carey Grace E.,
Schlecht Stephen H.,
Wojtys Edward M.,
AshtonMiller James A.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
journal of orthopaedic research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.041
H-Index - 155
eISSN - 1554-527X
pISSN - 0736-0266
DOI - 10.1002/jor.22966
Subject(s) - enthesis , fibrocartilage , anatomy , ligament , medicine , pathology , tendon , osteoarthritis , articular cartilage , alternative medicine
The femoral enthesis of the human anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is known to be more susceptible to injury than the tibial enthesis. To determine whether anatomic differences might help explain this difference, we quantified the microscopic appearance of both entheses in 15 unembalmed knee specimens using light microscopy, toluidine blue stain and image analysis. The amount of calcified fibrocartilage and uncalcified fibrocartilage, and the ligament entheseal attachment angle were then compared between the femoral and tibial entheses via linear mixed‐effects models. The results showed marked differences in anatomy between the two entheses. The femoral enthesis exhibited a 3.9‐fold more acute ligament attachment angle than the tibial enthesis ( p < 0.001), a 43% greater calcified fibrocartilage tissue area ( p < 0.001), and a 226% greater uncalcified fibrocartilage depth ( p < 0.001), with the latter differences being particularly pronounced in the central region. We conclude that the ACL femoral enthesis has more fibrocartilage and a more acute ligament attachment angle than the tibial enthesis, which provides insight into why it is more vulnerable to failure. © 2015 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 33:1811–1817, 2015.