Premium
Use of high resolution dual‐energy x‐ray absorptiometry‐region free analysis (DXA‐RFA) to detect local periprosthetic bone remodeling events
Author(s) -
Wilkinson J. Mark,
Morris Richard M.,
MartinFernandez Miguel A.,
Pozo Jose M.,
Frangi Alejandro F.,
Maheson Marci,
Yang Lang
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
journal of orthopaedic research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.041
H-Index - 155
eISSN - 1554-527X
pISSN - 0736-0266
DOI - 10.1002/jor.22823
Subject(s) - periprosthetic , medicine , region of interest , dual energy x ray absorptiometry , bone remodeling , bone mineral , nuclear medicine , femoral neck , dual energy , prosthesis , radiology , arthroplasty , osteoporosis , surgery
Dual‐energy x‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the gold standard method for measuring periprosthetic bone remodeling, but relies on a region of interest (ROI) analysis approach. While this addresses issues of anatomic variability, it is insensitive to bone remodeling events at the sub‐ROI level. We have validated a high‐spatial resolution tool, termed DXA‐region free analysis (DXA‐RFA) that uses advanced image processing approaches to allow quantitation of bone mineral density (BMD) at the individual pixel (data‐point) level. Here we compared the resolution of bone remodeling measurements made around a stemless femoral prosthesis in 18 subjects over 24 months using ROI‐based analysis versus that made using DXA‐RFA. Using the ROI approach the regional pattern of BMD change varied by region, with greatest loss in ROI5 (20%, p < 0.001), and largest gain in ROI4 (6%, p < 0.05). Analysis using DXA‐RFA showed a focal zone of increased BMD localized to the prosthesis–bone interface (30–40%, p < 0.001) that was not resolved using conventional DXA analysis. The 20% bone loss observed in ROI5 with conventional DXA was resolved to a focal area adjacent to the cut surface of the infero‐medial femoral neck (up to 40%, p < 0.0001). DXA‐RFA enables high resolution analysis of DXA datasets without the limitations incurred using ROI‐based approaches. © 2015 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 33:712–716, 2015.