Premium
Lengthening the moment arm of the patella confers enhanced extensor mechanism power following total knee arthroplasty
Author(s) -
Hamilton David F.,
Simpson A. Hamish R.W.,
Burnett Richard,
Patton James T.,
Moran Matthew,
Clement Nicholas D.,
Howie Colin R.,
Gaston Paul
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
journal of orthopaedic research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.041
H-Index - 155
eISSN - 1554-527X
pISSN - 0736-0266
DOI - 10.1002/jor.22344
Subject(s) - patella , total knee arthroplasty , mechanism (biology) , moment (physics) , arthroplasty , medicine , physical medicine and rehabilitation , orthodontics , surgery , physics , classical mechanics , quantum mechanics
We investigated whether a postulated biomechanical advantage conferred to the extensor mechanism by a change in knee implant design was detectable in patients by direct physical testing. 212 TKA patients were enrolled in a double blind randomized controlled trial to receive either a traditional implant or one which incorporated new design features. Extensor mechanism power output and physical performance on a battery of timed functional activities was assessed pre‐operatively and then at 6, 26, and 52 weeks post‐operatively. Significantly enhanced power output was observed in both groups post‐arthroplasty; however, the new design implant group demonstrated a greater change in power output than the traditional implant group. Posthoc testing of between group differences highlighted greater improvement at all post‐operative assessments. At 52 weeks, patients receiving the implant with the postulated biomechanical advantage achieved 116% of the power output of their contralateral limb, whereas patients with the traditional design achieved 90%. No between group difference was detected in the patient's time to complete functional tasks. Thus, patients receiving a knee implant of a modern design (theoretically able to confer a mechanical advantage to the extensor mechanism) were found to generate significantly greater extensor power than those receiving a traditional implant without the postulated mechanical advantage. © 2013 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 31:1201–1207, 2013