Premium
Fracture healing in protease‐activated receptor‐2 deficient mice
Author(s) -
O'Neill Kevin R.,
Stutz Christopher M.,
Mignemi Nicholas A.,
Cole Heather,
Murry Matthew R.,
Nyman Jeffry S.,
Hamm Heidi,
Schoenecker Jonathan G.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of orthopaedic research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.041
H-Index - 155
eISSN - 1554-527X
pISSN - 0736-0266
DOI - 10.1002/jor.22071
Subject(s) - bone healing , intramedullary rod , femur , radiography , femur fracture , medicine , fixation (population genetics) , callus , x ray microtomography , anatomy , biology , surgery , radiology , population , genetics , environmental health
Protease‐activated receptor‐2 (PAR‐2) provides an important link between extracellular proteases and the cellular initiation of inflammatory responses. The effect of PAR‐2 on fracture healing is unknown. This study investigates the in vivo effect of PAR‐2 deletion on fracture healing by assessing differences between wild‐type (PAR‐2 +/+ ) and knock‐out (PAR‐2 −/− ) mice. Unilateral mid‐shaft femur fractures were created in 34 PAR‐2 +/+ and 28 PAR‐2 −/− mice after intramedullary fixation. Histologic assessments were made at 1, 2, and 4 weeks post‐fracture (wpf), and radiographic (plain radiographs, micro‐computed tomography (µCT)) and biomechanical (torsion testing) assessments were made at 7 and 10 wpf. Both the fractured and un‐fractured contralateral femur specimens were evaluated. Polar moment of inertia (pMOI), tissue mineral density (TMD), bone volume fraction (BV/TV) were determined from µCT images, and callus diameter was determined from plain radiographs. Statistically significant differences in callus morphology as assessed by µCT were found between PAR‐2 −/− and PAR‐2 +/+ mice at both 7 and 10 wpf. However, no significant histologic, plain radiographic, or biomechanical differences were found between the genotypes. The loss of PAR‐2 was found to alter callus morphology as assessed by µCT but was not found to otherwise effect fracture healing in young mice. © 2012 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 30:1271–1276, 2012