z-logo
Premium
Quantifying tibial plafond fracture severity: Absorbed energy and fragment displacement agree with clinical rank ordering
Author(s) -
Anderson Donald D.,
Mosqueda Teresa,
Thomas Thaddeus,
Hermanson Evan L.,
Brown Thomas D.,
Marsh J. Lawrence
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
journal of orthopaedic research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.041
H-Index - 155
eISSN - 1554-527X
pISSN - 0736-0266
DOI - 10.1002/jor.20550
Subject(s) - concordance , displacement (psychology) , medicine , fracture (geology) , orthopedic surgery , confounding , radiography , soft tissue , orthodontics , radiology , nuclear medicine , surgery , materials science , psychology , composite material , psychotherapist
The energy of producing a fracture is considered one of the most important factors relating to injury severity, prognosis, and risk of complications, yet there has been no objective way to measure this important variable. The purpose of this study was to compare assessments of fracture severity made using new objective computed tomography (CT)–based methods versus the expert opinion of experienced orthopedic traumatologists. Fracture energy, fragment displacement, and soft tissue swelling were quantified in twenty tibial plafond fractures by analyzing injury CT scans. Three experienced orthopedic traumatologists then independently performed a rank order analysis of fracture severity, using plain radiographs. The concordance among the three clinicians ranged from 87% to 91%. Objective fracture severity measurements made with the CT algorithm agreed well with the clinical assessments (fracture energy concordance from 73% to 76%, fragment displacement from 82% to 89%, and soft tissue swelling from 61% to 65%). These are the first objective, CT‐based measures of fracture severity. With further refinement, this conceptually novel method has the potential to serve as a valuable tool to provide objective measurement of fracture severity, allowing one to control for this previously confounding variable in large multicenter studies. © 2008 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 26:1046–1052, 2008

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here