Premium
Combination of anorganic bovine‐derived hydroxyapatite with binding peptide does not enhance bone healing in a critical‐size defect in a rabbit model
Author(s) -
Sarahrudi Kambiz,
Mousavi Mehdi,
Grossschmidt Karl,
Sela Nezir,
König Franz,
Vécsei Vilmos,
Aharinejad Seyedhossein
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
journal of orthopaedic research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.041
H-Index - 155
eISSN - 1554-527X
pISSN - 0736-0266
DOI - 10.1002/jor.20527
Subject(s) - bone healing , osteotomy , femur , dentistry , medicine , implant , radiography , bone formation , surgery
Anorganic bovine‐derived hydroxyapatite (ABM) in combination with binding peptid (P‐15) has demonstrated the capacity to improve the healing of periodontal defects. This study evaluated the benefit of ABM/P‐15 to promote healing of cortical long bone defects in a rabbit model. A 5‐mm segmental bone defect was created in the femur and fixed with a plate. There were two treatment groups: no implant ( n = 12) and ABM/P‐15 ( n = 12). At 4, 8, and 12 weeks, healing of the defect was evaluated with radiographs and histomorphometric examination of the treated femora. After 4 weeks, radiographs showed bone formation without signs of complete consolidation in three of four animals in the control group and two of four ABM/P‐15 treated animals. At the later course of the treatment, no radiologic difference was evident between the treatment groups. Histomorphometric evaluation revealed an area of 1.29 ± 0.11 mm 2 and 0.97 ± 0.21 mm 2 of newly produced bone in animals of the control group and ABM/P‐15 group after 4 weeks. After 8 and 12 weeks, animals in the control group had an area of 2.44 ± 0.62 mm 2 and 2.5 ± 0.2 mm 2 of newly produced bone within the osteotomy gap compared to 1.6 ± 0.65 mm 2 and 1.56 ± 0.27 mm 2 in the ABM/P‐15 group ( p = 0.0004). An enhanced or accelerated ingrowth of bone, as reported in previous studies, was not observed. Our results imply that the ABM/P‐15 is not a suitable graft for the treatment of critical‐sized segmental defects in long bones. © 2008 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 26:759–763, 2008