z-logo
Premium
Decorin antisense gene therapy improves functional healing of early rabbit ligament scar with enhanced collagen fibrillogenesis in vivo
Author(s) -
Nakamura Norimasa,
Hart David A.,
Boorman Richard S.,
Kaneda Yasufumi,
Shrive Nigel G.,
Marchuk Linda L.,
Shino Konsei,
Ochi Takahiro,
Frank Cyril B.
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
journal of orthopaedic research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.041
H-Index - 155
eISSN - 1554-527X
pISSN - 0736-0266
DOI - 10.1002/jor.1100180402
Subject(s) - decorin , fibrillogenesis , ligament , scars , in vivo , tendon , extracellular matrix , fibril , population , chemistry , pathology , proteoglycan , anatomy , medicine , biology , biochemistry , microbiology and biotechnology , environmental health
Injured ligaments heal with scar tissue, which has mechanical properties inferior to those of normal ligament, potentially resulting in re‐injury, joint instability, and subsequent degenerative arthritis. In ligament scars, normal large‐diameter collagen fibrils have been shown to be replaced by a homogenous population of small collagen fibrils. Because collagen is a major tensile load‐bearing matrix element and because the proteoglycan decorin is known to inhibit collagen fibrillogenesis, we hypothesized that the restoration of larger collagen fibrils in a rabbit ligament scar, by down‐regulating the proteoglycan decorin, would improve the mechanical properties of scar. In contrast to sense and injection‐treated controls, in vivo treatment of injured ligament by antisense decorin oligodeoxynucleotides led to an increased development of larger collagen fibrils in early scar and a significant improvement in both scar failure strength (83–85% improvement at 6 weeks; p < 0.01) and scar creep elongation (33–48% less irrecoverable creep; p < 0.03) under loading. This is the first report that in vivo manipulation of collagen fibrillogenesis improves tissue function during repair processes with gene therapy. These findings not only suggest the potential use of this type of approach to improve the healing of various soft tissues (skin, ligament, tendon, and so on) but also support the use of such methods to better understand specific structure‐function relationships in scars.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here