Premium
Rib cage deformities in scoliosis: Spine morphology, rib cage stiffness, and tomography imaging
Author(s) -
Closkey Robert F.,
Schultz Albert B.
Publication year - 1993
Publication title -
journal of orthopaedic research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.041
H-Index - 155
eISSN - 1554-527X
pISSN - 0736-0266
DOI - 10.1002/jor.1100110515
Subject(s) - rib cage , cage , anatomy , scoliosis , stiffness , cobb angle , deformity , medicine , materials science , surgery , structural engineering , composite material , engineering
A computer‐implemented biomechanical model of a thoracolumbar spine and deformable rib cage was used to investigate the influence of spine morphology and rib cage stiffness properties on the rib cage deformities that arise from scoliosis and to study the relationship of actual rib distortions with those seen on computed tomography (CT) scans. For the purposes of this study, it was assumed that rib cage deformities result from forces imposed on the ribs by the deforming spine. When a structurally normal rib cage was allowed to follow freely the imposition of scoliotic curves on the spine, different configurations of scoliosis led to substantial differences in the resulting rib cage deformities. Rib cage lateral offset correlated well with the Cobb angle of the scoliosis but not with the apical vertebral axial rotation, whereas rib cage axial rotation correlated well with apical vertebral axial rotation but not with the Cobb angle. These model‐obtained findings mirror clinical findings that correction of the Cobb angle leads to correction of the lateral offset of the rib cage but does not correlate well with correction of the rib cage axial rotation. The stiffnesses of the ligamentous tissue connecting the sternum to the pelvis, of the costovertebral joints, and of the ribs themselves also influenced the rib deformities substantially. The influence of the sternopelvic ligamentous ties has not been recognized previously. The total rib cage volume remained essentially constant regardless of the severity of the resulting deformity, but the distribution of this volume between convex and concave sides varied somewhat. Simulated CT scans of model rib cages suggested that distortions of individual ribs are substantially exaggerated in such images.