Premium
Evidence for different sources of stress‐generated potentials in wet and dry bone
Author(s) -
Otter M.,
Shoenung J.,
Williams W. S.
Publication year - 1985
Publication title -
journal of orthopaedic research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.041
H-Index - 155
eISSN - 1554-527X
pISSN - 0736-0266
DOI - 10.1002/jor.1100030308
Subject(s) - electrode , cantilever , bending , piezoelectricity , materials science , stress (linguistics) , wetting , voltage , composite material , sign (mathematics) , position (finance) , mechanics , chemistry , mathematics , physics , electrical engineering , engineering , mathematical analysis , linguistics , philosophy , finance , economics
Physiologically moist bone and dry bone behave differently when tested for electrical response to cantilever bending. To characterize this difference more precisely, voltages were generated in the same specimen in each of the two states via the same testing procedure—changing the electrode‐to‐force distance by moving the electrodes and holding the force position constant. In the dry state, a nonsystematic pattern of voltages versus electrode position was generated. In the wet state, a linear relationship was found. Furtive on wetting the specimen. The implication is that different electromechanical transduction mechanisms are involved in the wet dry cases. The dominant mechanism in the wet case is taken to be the streaming potential rather than piezoelectricity.