Premium
A new method to study inhomogeneities in climate records: Brownian motion or random deviations?
Author(s) -
Lindau Ralf,
Venema Victor
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
international journal of climatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.58
H-Index - 166
eISSN - 1097-0088
pISSN - 0899-8418
DOI - 10.1002/joc.6105
Subject(s) - statistical physics , brownian motion , standard deviation , fractional brownian motion , variance (accounting) , homogenization (climate) , signal (programming language) , series (stratigraphy) , statistics , mathematics , econometrics , environmental science , physics , geology , computer science , ecology , paleontology , accounting , business , biology , biodiversity , programming language
Climate data are affected by inhomogeneities due to historical changes in the way the measurements were performed. Understanding these inhomogeneities is important for accurate estimates of long‐term changes in the climate. These inhomogeneities are typically characterized by the number of breaks and the size of the jumps or the variance of the break signal, but a full characterization of the break signal also includes its temporal behaviour. This study develops a method to distinguish between two types of breaks: random deviations from a baseline and Brownian motion. Strength and frequency of both break types are estimated by using the variance of the spatiotemporal differences in the time series of two nearby stations as input. Thus, the result is directly obtained from the data without running a homogenization algorithm to estimate the break signal from the data. This opens the possibility to determine the total number of breaks and not only that of the significantly large ones. The application to German temperature observations suggests generally small inhomogeneities dominated by random deviations from a baseline. U.S. stations, on the other hand, also show the characteristics of a strong Brownian‐motion‐type component.