z-logo
Premium
Impact of four‐stream radiative transfer algorithm on aerosol direct radiative effect and forcing
Author(s) -
Zhang Hua,
Wang Zhili,
Zhang Feng,
Jing Xianwen
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
international journal of climatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.58
H-Index - 166
eISSN - 1097-0088
pISSN - 0899-8418
DOI - 10.1002/joc.4289
Subject(s) - shortwave , aerosol , environmental science , radiative forcing , northern hemisphere , atmosphere (unit) , atmospheric sciences , radiative transfer , latitude , shortwave radiation , forcing (mathematics) , climatology , atmospheric radiative transfer codes , southern hemisphere , climate model , meteorology , climate change , geography , geology , radiation , physics , oceanography , geodesy , quantum mechanics
Large uncertainties remain in the estimation of aerosol direct radiative effect ( DRE ) and forcing ( DRF ). In this work, using an aerosol‐climate model with two‐ and four‐stream radiation schemes, we show that the radiative transfer algorithms contribute to the uncertainties. Aerosol shortwave DREs and heating rate are underestimated significantly by the two‐stream algorithm. For present‐day conditions, the four‐stream algorithms are found to enhance global annual mean aerosol shortwave DREs by more than 8% (14%) at the top of the atmosphere ( TOA ), 15% (18%) in the atmosphere, and 12% (15%) at the surface for all‐sky (clear‐sky) case. The regional‐averaged relative differences in aerosol shortwave DREs between the two‐ and four‐stream algorithms increase as latitude increases, exceeding 25% at the TOA and 30% at the surface in the high latitudes of the Southern Hemisphere. The DRE differences due to the four‐stream algorithms are negative, except for the Arctic, Tibetan Plateau, Arabia, and Sahara, at the TOA , are positive in the atmosphere, and are negative at the surface, with the maximum exceeding 4.0 W m −2 . Increases in aerosol shortwave heating rates due to the four‐stream algorithms are generally more than 10% and may even exceed 100%. Our results also show that the two‐stream algorithm underestimates the DRFs due to anthropogenic aerosols. Significant underestimation appears in the middle latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere, with the maximum being close to the quantity of 0.6 W m −2 for clear‐sky case. This study indicates that a multi‐stream radiative transfer algorithm is necessary to reduce the uncertainties of aerosol DREs and DRFs estimated by global climate models.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here