Premium
A six‐step approach to developing future synoptic classifications based on GCM output
Author(s) -
Lee Cameron C.,
Sheridan Scott C.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
international journal of climatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.58
H-Index - 166
eISSN - 1097-0088
pISSN - 0899-8418
DOI - 10.1002/joc.2394
Subject(s) - gcm transcription factors , climatology , data set , environmental science , atmospheric research , set (abstract data type) , climate model , general circulation model , cluster (spacecraft) , climate change , meteorology , geography , computer science , statistics , mathematics , geology , oceanography , programming language
One way in which global climate model (GCM) output can be utilized to infer local impacts is through the use of synoptic climatology: creating a set of atmospheric patterns that capture the variability in the climate system, and then analyzing trends and variability in the frequency of these patterns moving into the future. In this paper, we demonstrate a new synoptic climatological technique for classifying atmospheric patterns that can be used in conjunction with GCM output data (in this case, the Community Climate System Model 3). We apply this method to 850‐hPa temperature patterns over the contiguous United States to derive daily categorizations. A total of 15 clusters are created from the data set; once the mean GCM bias is removed, historical cluster frequencies in the GCM data set are not statistically different from those of the reanalysis data set. In the future, significant changes in frequency are observed across most of the transition season clusters, as they broaden in seasonality at the expense of winter clusters, some of which nearly entirely disappear. Changes are greater moving further into the future, and greater for the more carbon‐intensive special report on emissions scenarios (SRES) scenarios (A1FI, A2) than the less‐intensive scenario tested (B1). Diagnostics test how well the mean patterns of the reanalysis data set, GCM historical data set and the future GCM data sets resemble each other. For some clusters, mean bias between the historical and future data sets grows substantially by the end of the 21st century under the more carbon‐intensive scenarios. Copyright © 2011 Royal Meteorological Society