Premium
Relationships between autumn precipitation anomalies in southeastern South America and El Niño event classification
Author(s) -
Antico P. L.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
international journal of climatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.58
H-Index - 166
eISSN - 1097-0088
pISSN - 0899-8418
DOI - 10.1002/joc.1734
Subject(s) - climatology , advection , precipitation , subtropical ridge , vorticity , geology , humidity , subtropics , sea surface temperature , environmental science , geography , vortex , meteorology , physics , fishery , biology , thermodynamics
The classification of El Niño events was performed based on the time evolution of sea surface warming in the tropical Pacific Ocean during the period 1950–2000. Two sets of events were constructed: one in which the warming core migrates eastward along the tropical Pacific until April–June of the following year, and another one in which it evolves westward until November–January. The first type has associated positive precipitation anomalies over southeastern South America during April–June. It results from a favourable combination of cyclonic vorticity advection and humidity convergence. At high levels, cyclonic vorticity advection is explained in terms of an eastward extension of the subtropical jet. Enhanced humidity advection takes place by an increased low‐level northwesterly flow to the east of the Andes. It provides enough moisture availability that, in combination with the upper‐level cyclonic vorticity advection, supports heavy precipitation during April–June. The second type of event exhibits slight negative or near‐normal precipitation anomalies over the same region. Both low and high‐level circulation anomalies are also weaker in this case. The 1997–1998 El Niño is analysed separately because it cannot be classified into any of the previously described event types. The observed distribution of both types of events along the analysed period changes after the 1970s. Comparison with other authors' results suggests the influence of low‐frequency processes such as the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO). Copyright © 2008 Royal Meteorological Society