Premium
Temperature reconstructions and comparisons with instrumental data from a tree‐ring network for the European Alps
Author(s) -
Frank David,
Esper Jan
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
international journal of climatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.58
H-Index - 166
eISSN - 1097-0088
pISSN - 0899-8418
DOI - 10.1002/joc.1210
Subject(s) - dendrochronology , divergence (linguistics) , dendroclimatology , elevation (ballistics) , climatology , calibration , period (music) , maximum density , physical geography , environmental science , geology , geography , statistics , mathematics , physics , paleontology , geometry , philosophy , linguistics , quantum mechanics , acoustics
Ring‐width and maximum latewood density data from a network of high‐elevation sites distributed across the European Alps are used to reconstruct regional temperatures. The network integrates 53 ring‐width and 31 density chronologies from stands of four species all located above 1500 m a.s.l. The development and basic climatic response patterns of this network are described elsewhere (Frank and Esper, 2005). The common temperature signal over the study region allowed regional reconstructions to be developed using principal component regression models for average June–August (1600–1988) and April–September (1650–1987) temperatures from ring‐width and density records, respectively. Similar climatic histories are derived for both seasons, but with the ring‐width and density‐based reconstructions seemingly weighted toward carrying more of their variance in the lower and higher frequency domains, respectively. Distinct warm decades are the 1940s, 1860s, 1800s, 1730s, 1660s and the 1610s, and cold decades, the 1910s, 1810s, 1710s, 1700s and the 1690s. Because of the model fitting and the shorter time spans involved, comparisons between the reconstructions with high‐elevation instrumental data during the majority of the 1864–1972 calibration period show good agreement. Yet, prior to this period, from which only a few low elevation temperature records are available, a trend divergence between tree‐ring and instrumental records is observed. We present evidence that this divergence may be explained by the ring‐width data carrying more of an annual rather than warm‐season signal in the lower frequency domain. Other factors such as noise, tree‐ring standardization, or the more uncertain nature of low‐frequency trends in early instrumental records and their homogenization, might help explain this divergence as well. Copyright © 2005 Royal Meteorological Society.