Premium
Verbesserung der Y ‐Werte bei Wachstum von Hansenula polymorpha auf Methanol durch simultane Verwertung von Glucose
Author(s) -
Müller R.,
Markuske K. D.,
Babel W.
Publication year - 1983
Publication title -
zeitschrift für allgemeine mikrobiologie
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.58
H-Index - 54
eISSN - 1521-4028
pISSN - 0044-2208
DOI - 10.1002/jobm.19830230607
Subject(s) - chemostat , methanol , substrate (aquarium) , dilution , chemistry , yield (engineering) , growth rate , yeast , biochemistry , biology , thermodynamics , organic chemistry , mathematics , physics , bacteria , ecology , genetics , geometry
The simultaneous utilization of methanol and glucose by Hansenula polymorpha MH20 was investigated in chemostat (C‐limited) cultivation. The mixed‐substrate utilization results in biomass yields which are greater up to 20 to 25% as expected assuming an additive growth on both substrates. This is referred to as an auxiliary‐substrate effect. Additionally, methanol can be utilized at higher growth rates in the presence of glucose compared to those obtained on this substrate alone. The extend of the auxiliary‐substrate effect and the optimum ratio of substrates to reach this effect depend on dilution rate. The greatest stimulation in yield is obtained at D ∼ 0.1 h −1 , after raising the dilution rate this effect diminishes. At a rate of 0.1 h −1 the optimum mixed‐substrate ratio of methanol: glucose is 7: 1(g). By increasing the growth rate the ratio changes toward glucose and reached a value of 1:1 (g) at D = 0.3 h −1 . This change in the optimum ratio correlates with diminution in yield coefficient of methanolp accomanying an increase in growth rate > 0.15 h −1 . Energy balances of the utilization of the single substrates are used for interpretation of these results. From this it is evident that methanol does not play the role of an energy‐rich substrate in the metabolism of yeast. Rather glucose is the energy‐providing substrate in this combination.