Premium
Competing hypotheses analyses of the associations between group task conflict and group relationship conflict
Author(s) -
Choi Kyoosang,
Cho Bongsoon
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
journal of organizational behavior
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.938
H-Index - 177
eISSN - 1099-1379
pISSN - 0894-3796
DOI - 10.1002/job.733
Subject(s) - psychology , social psychology , context (archaeology) , task (project management) , group conflict , linkage (software) , group (periodic table) , affect (linguistics) , economics , management , gene , biology , paleontology , biochemistry , chemistry , organic chemistry , communication
Although previous research have reported strong and positive intercorrelations between group task conflict and group relationship conflict, several different theoretical rationales exist for the positive link and the empirical literature remains equivocal. To clarify the causal linkage between the two types of conflict, we derived seven models specifying how group task and relationship conflict can be related to each other, including some rival explanations. We tested the competing models using a longitudinal panel design, with data collected from 74 project teams comprising a total of 388 students. The results indicated that relationship conflict led to an increased subsequent task conflict through negative group affect. Task conflict, however, predicted a subsequent relationship conflict under a specific context, that is, groups that had lower levels of trust among the members. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.