Premium
The allocation of prestigious positions in organizational science: accumulative advantage, sponsored mobility, and contest mobility
Author(s) -
Miller C. Chet,
Glick William H.,
Cardinal Laura B.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
journal of organizational behavior
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.938
H-Index - 177
eISSN - 1099-1379
pISSN - 0894-3796
DOI - 10.1002/job.325
Subject(s) - contest , prestige , position (finance) , tracking (education) , sociology , field (mathematics) , citation , public relations , management , political science , economics , law , pedagogy , philosophy , linguistics , mathematics , finance , pure mathematics
Abstract More than 200 freshly minted doctoral graduates enter the field of organization science every year. A non‐trivial number of existing faculty members move from one university to another every year, while other organization science faculty leave academia to enter retirement, consulting, or industry. Despite the importance of this large, complex system of entries and exits, few attempts have been made to explicitly understand how the system works. Drawing upon sociology of science and careers research, we studied the underlying form of the position allocation system by focusing on the relative importance of research success and prior affiliations as antecedents of movement and stability across positions. We used three theoretical models: accumulative advantage, sponsored mobility, and contest mobility. Tracking hundreds of faculty members for 16 years post doctorate, we find a downward cascading of affiliation prestige over time that affects people more dramatically and quickly than we expected, especially women. Accumulative advantage, the most predictive of our models, does help to maintain relative but not absolute prestige, at least until its effects wane in later years of the career. These findings are relevant to scholars interested in the sociology of science, organization scholars interested in the underlying dynamics of their discipline, and individuals making career choices. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.