z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Incidence of epicardial connections between the right pulmonary vein carina and right atrium during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: A comparison between the conventional method and unipolar signal modification
Author(s) -
Yano Hiroki,
Nishida Taku,
Sugiura Junichi,
Keshi Ayaka,
Kanaoka Koshiro,
Terasaki Satoshi,
Hashimoto Yukihiro,
Nakada Yasuki,
Nakagawa Hitoshi,
Ueda Tomoya,
Seno Ayako,
Onoue Kenji,
Watanabe Makoto,
Saito Yoshihiko
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
journal of arrhythmia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.463
H-Index - 21
eISSN - 1883-2148
pISSN - 1880-4276
DOI - 10.1002/joa3.12672
Subject(s) - medicine , ablation , pulmonary vein , atrial fibrillation , catheter ablation , cardiology , right atrium , catheter , surgery
Background When performing an electrical isolation of ipsilateral pulmonary veins (PVs) for atrial fibrillation, physicians often need additional radiofrequency (RF) ablation in the carina region between the superior and inferior PVs to achieve a right PV isolation because of intercaval bundles between the right PVs and right atrium (RA). We compared the efficacy of a high‐power and short‐duration ablation guided by unipolar signal modification (UM) with the conventional method (CM) for ablating epicardial connections between the right PV carina and RA. Methods The study subjects consisted of patients who underwent an initial box isolation of atrial fibrillation from January 2015 to December 2019 at Nara Medical University Hospital. Among these patients, 94 and 65 patients who met the criteria were assigned to the CM and UM groups, respectively. We retrospectively analyzed the anterior ablation line of the right PV using an electroanatomical mapping system. Patients whose initial ablation line included the right PV carina were excluded. Results Six and seven patients were, respectively, excluded from the CM and UM groups. Among 88 CM group patients, 21 needed additional right PV carina ablation, while among 58 UM group patients, 30 needed additional right PV carina ablation ( p  = .001). No anatomical factors were associated with the additional right PV carina ablation. Conclusions Compared to the CM group, a box isolation was less achievable without RF ablation at the right PV carina in the UM group. We should consider a long‐duration ablation for epicardial connections between the right PV carina and RA.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here