Open AccessA new interpretation of nonpulmonary vein substrates of the left atrium in patients with atrial fibrillation
Author(s) -
Rillo Mariano,
Palamà Zefferino,
Punzi Raffaele,
Vitanza Salvatore,
Aloisio Angelo,
Polini Silvia,
Tucci Antonella,
Pollastrelli Annalisa,
Zonno Francesco,
Anastasia Antonio,
Giannattasio Cesare Franco,
My Luigi
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of arrhythmia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.463
H-Index - 21
eISSN - 1883-2148
pISSN - 1880-4276
DOI - 10.1002/joa3.12521
Subject(s) - medicine , atrial fibrillation , left atrium , sinus rhythm , ablation , catheter ablation , atrium (architecture) , cardiology , pulmonary vein
Background Substrate analysis of the left atrium in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation has limitations when performed by means of simple bipolar acquisition. Objective To evaluate the incidence of low‐voltage zones (LVZs) through maps constructed by means of various catheters: multipolar (MC), omnipolar (OC), and circular catheters (CMCs) with the 3D electro‐anatomical systems (3d‐S) CARTO3 and EnSite Precision. Methods To assess LVZs, we acquired maps by means of CMC and MC in the voltage range 0.05‐0.5 mV in 70 consecutive patients in sinus rhythm. In the case of OC only, we made an intra‐patient comparison of bipolar maps constructed by means of the along and across, and HD‐Wave configurations of the EnSite 3d‐S in the ranges of 0.05‐0.5 and 0.5‐1.0 mV. On the basis of this comparison, we chose the range that best identified LVZs as a set of different colors (SDC) compatible with patchy fibrosis (qualitative analysis). Subsequently, we detected the voltage values corresponding to purple and gray points, close to SDC, and the value inside corresponding to blue, green, and red colors, and we evaluated the color change in other voltage ranges. Finally, we performed a quantitative analysis of LVZs by applying the qualitative characteristics described above. Results On the basis of our settings, for OC, the optimal range identifying LVZs was 0.3‐0.6 mV. OC revealed smaller LVZs than MC ( P < .05 or P < .001), except in the lateral wall. No significant differences were observed between CMCs. Conclusions In our experience, OC does not present the limits of bipolar HD maps, though further studies are needed in order to confirm that 0.3‐0.6 mV is the optimal voltage range within which to identify LVZs.