Premium
Axonal regeneration of an identified Helisoma neuron depends on the site of axotomy
Author(s) -
Kruk P. J.,
Bulloch A. G. M.
Publication year - 1992
Publication title -
journal of neuroscience research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.72
H-Index - 160
eISSN - 1097-4547
pISSN - 0360-4012
DOI - 10.1002/jnr.490310302
Subject(s) - axotomy , axon , neuroscience , regeneration (biology) , anatomy , biology , neurite , neuron , reinnervation , growth cone , central nervous system , microbiology and biotechnology , biochemistry , in vitro
Abstract Axotomy or molluscan neurons usually results in axonal regeneration. In this study, we tested the axotomy response of an identified neuron of the pond snail Helisoma trivolvis (buccal neuron 4, B4). This neuron has two primary axonal branches, the ipsilateral axon and the contralateral axon, each innervating one of the paired salivary glands. The ipsilateral axon projects via the ipsilateral esophageal nerve trunk whereas the contralateral axon crosses both buccal ganglia and projects via the contralateral esophageal nerve trunk. We tested various procedures of axotomy: injury to one axon or both axons, close to the ganglion or more distal. Surprisingly, we found that proximal axotomy of the ipsilateral axon was not usually followed by axonal regeneration. By contrast, all other procedures of axotomy (e.g., distal ipsilateral, or proximal bilateral) resulted in robust axonal regeneration and target reinnervation. Thus, in this preparation, axotomy may or may not result in axonal regeneration, depending on the site(s) of axotomy. To the best of our knowledge, such a differential result has not yet been found in any other preparation. We conclude that axotomy is not always a sufficient condition for axonal regeneration of molluscan neurons. We hypothesize that a damaged axonal stump may be a necessary condition for the initiation of regeneration. An alternative hypothesis is that neurite outgrowth is inhibited in normal mature neurons by a target‐derived factor. This hypothetical factor would be transported retrogradely, but not anterogradely, along axons.