Premium
Multi‐coil electromagnets: An accurate magnetic equivalent circuit, cost, and energy management
Author(s) -
Hashemi Ali,
Yazdanpanah Qaraei Parsa
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
international journal of numerical modelling: electronic networks, devices and fields
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.249
H-Index - 30
eISSN - 1099-1204
pISSN - 0894-3370
DOI - 10.1002/jnm.2868
Subject(s) - electromagnet , electromagnetic coil , electrical engineering , magnetic field , engineering , bifilar coil , magnetic circuit , mechanical engineering , magnet , rogowski coil , physics , quantum mechanics
Abstract Using nonintegrated multiple coils in an electromagnet is a way to manage energy and reduce maintenance costs. In order to model and analyze the lifting force and the magnetic field in different zone of the electromagnet, an exact magnetic equivalent circuit (MEC) is required. In this paper, an accurate MEC to analyze dual‐coil electromagnets is presented. MATLAB and ANSYS MAXWELL software are used to analyze the proposed MEC and simulate the magnetic field and the lifting force, respectively. In multi‐coil electromagnets, if a coil burns out, the electromagnet will still be able to lift the loads with a percentage of the nominal load weight. Also, it is only necessary to replace the burned coil, which reduces the maintenance costs of the electromagnet. Flexibility in winding excitation is another advantage of using multiple coils in electromagnets. In this case, one or more coils can be excited according to the weight of the load. This feature not only increases the lifetime of the coils but also reduces the energy consumption of the electromagnet and no need to use expensive power electronic converters to continuously control the current of coils. To evaluate the proposed MEC, the laboratory platform of an electromagnet was made to lift a load of 100 kg in the air gap of 2 mm and tested in two modes, single‐coil and dual‐coil. The analytical, simulation, and experimental results have very good agreement, indicating the high accuracy of the proposed MEC.