Premium
Rilpivirine resistance and the dangerous liaisons with substitutions at position 184 among patients infected with HIV‐1: Analysis from a national drug‐resistance database (ARCA)
Author(s) -
Rossotti Roberto,
Fonte Luigi,
Meini Genny,
Maggiolo Franco,
Zazzi Maurizio,
Rusconi Stefano
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of medical virology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.782
H-Index - 121
eISSN - 1096-9071
pISSN - 0146-6615
DOI - 10.1002/jmv.23978
Subject(s) - rilpivirine , drug resistance , confidence interval , virology , odds ratio , human immunodeficiency virus (hiv) , medicine , nevirapine , database , biology , antiretroviral therapy , viral load , genetics , computer science
Rilpivirine (RPV) is a novel NNRTI with a mutational pattern different from first‐generation drugs of the same class: 16 resistance‐associated mutations (RAM) are listed, but the combination E138K + M184I seems to be the most important. Aims of the present study were to evaluate the prevalence of these RAMs in Italian HIV‐1 infected patients and to assess if previous drug history could represent a risk to develop RPV‐related RAMs. The analysis was performed using the ARCA database, which contains data on resistance and therapy from subjects throughout Italy. Prevalence of RPV‐associated and first‐generation NNRTI‐associated RAMs was evaluated. Linear regression model, odds ratio and 95% Confidence Interval were used to assess factors associated with the development of RPV RAMs, substitutions at position 184 and their combinations. A total of 8,067 tests were selected within the database. In Italian HIV‐positive HAART‐naïve patients, prevalence of the main RAMs for RPV is low except for E138A (present in 5.1% of subjects). The combination E138K + M184I is absent in both naïve and experienced subjects. A previous exposure to NVP might increase the risk to develop RPV‐associated RAMs. TDF, EFV, and possibly FTC may predispose to the selection for M184I. Among Italian patients the susceptibility to RPV is widespread since some severe substitutions (e.g., E138K are rare), whereas issues exist for others (i.e., E138A, Y181C) which are more frequent. Appropriate use of RPV within a therapeutic sequencing might be controversial. J. Med. Virol. 86:1459–1466, 2014 . © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.