Premium
Performances of four fourth‐generation human immunodeficiency virus‐1 screening assays
Author(s) -
Song Eun Young,
Hur Mina,
Roh Eun Youn,
Park Myoung Hee,
Moon HeeWon,
Yun Yeo Min
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of medical virology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.782
H-Index - 121
eISSN - 1096-9071
pISSN - 0146-6615
DOI - 10.1002/jmv.23423
Subject(s) - virology , human immunodeficiency virus (hiv) , biology , virus , lentivirus , viral disease , medicine
Fourth‐generation human immunodeficiency virus‐1 (HIV‐1) screening assays have improved sensitivity, but vary in performance characteristics. The purpose of this study was to evaluate four different fourth‐generation HIV‐1 assays. These assays included the AxSYM HIV Ag/Ab Combo (Abbott diagnostics, Delkenheim, Germany), ARCHITECT HIV Ag/Ab Combo (Abbott), Elecsys 2010 HIV Combi (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany), and Elecsys HIV Combi PT (Roche). A total of 1,306 samples that included 1,225 clinical samples and 81 samples consisting of seroconversion panels, an HIV‐1 p24 antigen sensitivity panel, and dilution series of HIV‐1 lysates and HIV‐1 antibodies were tested. All of the assays had sensitivities of 100% on clinical samples. The specificities of the AxSYM, ARCHITECT, Elecsys 2010 HIV Combi, and Elecsys HIV Combi PT were 99.6, 99.6, 99.0, and 99.5%, respectively. Of the 81 samples with different levels of HIV antigen or antibody and/or subtypes, Elecsys HIV Combi PT and ARCHITECT HIV Ag/Ab Combo showed better analytical sensitivities than the other two assays. In summary, the performance characteristics of AxSYM, ARCHITECT, and Elecsys HIV Combi PT were comparable and satisfactory for clinical samples. ARCHITECT HIV Ag/Ab Combo and Elecsys HIV Combi PT have the higher analytical sensitivities, and would be preferable for reducing the window period. J. Med. Virol. 84:1884–1888, 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.