Premium
Virological and immunological features of active cytomegalovirus infection in nonimmunosuppressed patients in a surgical and trauma intensive care unit
Author(s) -
Chilet Marifina,
Aguilar Gerardo,
Benet Isabel,
Belda Javier,
Tormo Nuria,
Carbonell José Antonio,
Clari María Ángeles,
Costa Elisa,
Navarro David
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
journal of medical virology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.782
H-Index - 121
eISSN - 1096-9071
pISSN - 0146-6615
DOI - 10.1002/jmv.21825
Subject(s) - cytomegalovirus , betaherpesvirinae , virology , medicine , intensive care unit , immunology , human cytomegalovirus , immune system , virus , intensive care , viral load , herpesviridae , viral disease , biology , intensive care medicine
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation occurs frequently in critically ill patients. The natural course of CMV infection and the interaction between CMV and the adaptive immune system in this setting remain poorly defined. Fifty‐three CMV‐seropositive patients in a surgical and trauma intensive care unit were included in this study. The CMV DNA load in tracheal aspirates (TA) and plasma (PL) was monitored by qPCR. CMV‐specific T‐cell immunity was assessed by intracellular cytokine staining. Plasma TNF‐α levels were determined by ELISA. CMV reactivation occurred in 39.7% of patients (23% had CMV DNA detected only in TA). The analysis of TA allowed an earlier diagnosis in 28% of patients. Clearance of CMV DNAemia preceded that of CMV DNA in TA in some episodes. Peak CMV DNA levels were significantly higher in TA than in PL ( P = 0.02). CMV reactivation developed in the presence of CMV‐specific T cells. Termination of CMV reactivation was associated with an expansion of functional CMV‐specific T cells. Plasma levels of TNF‐α did not allow for the prediction of the occurrence of CMV reactivation. CMV‐specific T‐cell immunity is preserved in most critically ill patients experiencing CMV reactivation. Analysis of respiratory specimens is imperative for an optimal monitoring of CMV reactivation in this setting. J. Med. Virol. 82:1384–1391, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.