Premium
Association of cytomegalovirus infection with post‐transplantation cardiac rejection as studied using the polymerase chain reaction
Author(s) -
Fernando Sirimali,
Booth James,
Boriskin Yuri,
Butcher Philip,
Carrington David,
Steel Helen,
Tryhorn Yvonne,
Corbishley Catherine,
Keeling Philip,
Murday Andrew,
McKenna William
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
journal of medical virology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.782
H-Index - 121
eISSN - 1096-9071
pISSN - 0146-6615
DOI - 10.1002/jmv.1890420412
Subject(s) - serology , cytomegalovirus , polymerase chain reaction , betaherpesvirinae , biopsy , medicine , immunology , antibody , cytomegalovirus infection , human cytomegalovirus , virus , transplantation , virology , herpesviridae , viral disease , pathology , biology , gene , biochemistry
The relationship between cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and cardiac allograft rejection is controversial, some authors reporting a significant association, others not, on the basis of the results of conventional virological diagnosis by culture or serology. This problem was reinvesti‐gated in 88 patients using a semi‐quantitative nest polymerase chain reaction (PCR) procedure for detecting CMV DNA in endomyocardial biopsy specimens. Significantly more positive biopsies were obtained from patients with moderate (grade 2; P = 0.02) or severe (grade 3a‐4; P = 0.03) rejection than with no or mild (grade 0‐1 b) rejection, whereas there was no significant association between rejection and CMV as diagnosed by virus isolation from urine, throat or blood, or by the detection of CMV‐IgM. PCR‐positive biopsies originated most frequently from CMV‐antibody positive recipients (R+) of hearts from seropositive donors (D+), in association with moderate or severe rejection rather than with mild or no rejection The detection of CMV in the heart thus seemed to be related more to R+D+ serological status than to severity of rejection, that is, to circumstances that favoured co‐infection with strains of CMV from both donor and recipient. Studies on sequential biopsy specimens from selected patients also provided evidence that CMV infection and rejection were not always related events. The PCR was able to differentiate latent from active CMV infection; moreover, some seroneg‐ative individuals gave repeatedly positive biopsies, thereby supporting the work of others that some patients undergo CMV infection without mounting a detectable antibody response. The use of the PCR provided additional and more definitive information linking CMV and post‐transplantation cardiac rejection when compared to conventional methods of viral diagnosis which were less suitable as correlates of deep seated focal infection. © 1994 Wiley‐Liss, inc.