z-logo
Premium
Unexpected distribution of hepatitis C virus genotypes in patients on hemodialysis and kidney transplant recipients
Author(s) -
Perez Renata M.,
Ferraz Maria Lucia G.,
Figueiredo Mauro S.,
Contado Denilson,
Koide Sandra,
Ferreira Adalgisa P.,
Cendoroglo Neto Miguel,
Medina Pestana José O.,
Silva Antonio Eduardo B.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
journal of medical virology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.782
H-Index - 121
eISSN - 1096-9071
pISSN - 0146-6615
DOI - 10.1002/jmv.10336
Subject(s) - hemodialysis , genotype , medicine , hepatitis c virus , population , hepatitis c , kidney transplantation , kidney disease , immunology , gastroenterology , kidney , virology , virus , biology , genetics , environmental health , gene
The distribution of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes in patients on hemodialysis and in kidney transplant recipients was compared with that observed in a control group composed of HCV‐infected individuals from the general population. A total of 340 patients were included in the study: 46 with end‐stage renal disease on regular hemodialysis treatment, 22 kidney transplant recipients and 272 controls matched for sex and age at a 4:1 ratio (controls to patient). HCV genotype was determined by sequencing of the 5′ untranslated region of the HCV genome. No difference was observed in the distribution of HCV genotypes in hemodialysis patients and renal transplant patients ( P  = 0.47). However, when each of these groups was compared with the control group, a significant difference was detected in the genotype distribution ( P  < 0.001). In hemodialysis and renal transplant patients the most prevalent subtype was 1a, followed by 1b, 3, and other less prevalent genotypes (2, 4, and 5), whereas in the control group the most prevalent subtype was 1b, followed by 3, 1a, and others. That observation may reflect differences in the epidemiology of HCV infection, viral characteristics and host factors in renal patients in comparison to the control group. J. Med. Virol. 69:489–494, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here