z-logo
Premium
Formation and hydrolysis of gas‐phase [UO 2 (R)] + : R═CH 3 , CH 2 CH 3 , CH═CH 2 , and C 6 H 5
Author(s) -
Tatosian Irena,
Bubas Amanda,
Iacovino Anna,
Kline Susan,
Metzler Luke,
Van Stipdonk Michael
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of mass spectrometry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.475
H-Index - 121
eISSN - 1096-9888
pISSN - 1076-5174
DOI - 10.1002/jms.4430
Subject(s) - chemistry , uranyl , decarboxylation , medicinal chemistry , dissociation (chemistry) , ketene , hydrolysis , radical , ion , organic chemistry , catalysis
The goals of the present study were (a) to create positively charged organo‐uranyl complexes with general formula [UO 2 (R)] + (eg, R═CH 3 and CH 2 CH 3 ) by decarboxylation of [UO 2 (O 2 C─R)] + precursors and (b) to identify the pathways by which the complexes, if formed, dissociate by collisional activation or otherwise react when exposed to gas‐phase H 2 O. Collision‐induced dissociation (CID) of both [UO 2 (O 2 C─CH 3 )] + and [UO 2 (O 2 C─CH 2 CH 3 )] + causes H + transfer and elimination of a ketene to leave [UO 2 (OH)] + . However, CID of the alkoxides [UO 2 (OCH 2 CH 3 )] + and [UO 2 (OCH 2 CH 2 CH 3 )] + produced [UO 2 (CH 3 )] + and [UO 2 (CH 2 CH 3 )] + , respectively. Isolation of [UO 2 (CH 3 )] + and [UO 2 (CH 2 CH 3 )] + for reaction with H 2 O caused formation of [UO 2 (H 2 O)] + by elimination of ·CH 3 and ·CH 2 CH 3 : Hydrolysis was not observed. CID of the acrylate and benzoate versions of the complexes, [UO 2 (O 2 C─CH═CH 2 )] + and [UO 2 (O 2 C─C 6 H 5 )] + , caused decarboxylation to leave [UO 2 (CH═CH 2 )] + and [UO 2 (C 6 H 5 )] + , respectively. These organometallic species do react with H 2 O to produce [UO 2 (OH)] + , and loss of the respective radicals to leave [UO 2 (H 2 O)] + was not detected. Density functional theory calculations suggest that formation of [UO 2 (OH)] + , rather than the hydrated U V O 2 + , cation is energetically favored regardless of the precursor ion. However, for the [UO 2 (CH 3 )] + and [UO 2 (CH 2 CH 3 )] + precursors, the transition state energy for proton transfer to generate [UO 2 (OH)] + and the associated neutral alkanes is higher than the path involving direct elimination of the organic neutral to form [UO 2 (H 2 O)] + . The situation is reversed for the [UO 2 (CH═CH 2 )] + and [UO 2 (C 6 H 5 )] + precursors: The transition state for proton transfer is lower than the energy required for creation of [UO 2 (H 2 O)] + by elimination of CH═CH 2 or C 6 H 5 radical.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom