Premium
Comparison of LID versus CID activation modes in tandem mass spectrometry of peptides
Author(s) -
Shenar Nawar,
Sommerer Nicolas,
Martinez Jean,
Enjalbal Christine
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
journal of mass spectrometry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.475
H-Index - 121
eISSN - 1096-9888
pISSN - 1076-5174
DOI - 10.1002/jms.1535
Subject(s) - chemistry , fragmentation (computing) , mass spectrometry , tandem mass spectrometry , tandem , metastability , ion , collision induced dissociation , analytical chemistry (journal) , peptide , mass spectrum , chromatography , organic chemistry , aerospace engineering , biochemistry , computer science , engineering , operating system
We report our contribution to the systematic investigation of peptide fragmentations performed on high‐performance Tof equipment, operating in MS and MS/MS modes, such as ESI‐QqTof and MALDI‐Tof/Tof instruments that are commonly available today in proteomic laboratories. Whereas the former analyzer's configuration provides low‐energy collision‐induced dissociations (CID), the latter allows tunable activation methods of the selected parent ion to induce either metastable laser‐induced dissociations (LID) or high‐energy CID (‘gas on spectra LID’). Fragmentation of the monoprotonated ion of 53 peptides (FW 807–2853 g/mol) was undertaken upon low‐energy CID on an ESI‐QTof mass spectrometer (Waters) as well as high‐energy CID and LID conditions on a MALDI Ultraflex mass spectrometer (Bruker). Systematic comparison of MS/MS spectra provided useful information on the performance of each piece of equipment for efficient peptide sequencing and also insights into the observed fragmentation behaviors. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.