z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
National survey on the practice of radiation therapists in A ustralia
Author(s) -
Sale Charlotte,
Halkett Georgia,
Cox Jenny
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of medical radiation sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.484
H-Index - 18
eISSN - 2051-3909
pISSN - 2051-3895
DOI - 10.1002/jmrs.155
Subject(s) - clarity , descriptive statistics , clinical practice , population , core (optical fiber) , medical education , phase (matter) , work (physics) , psychology , medicine , nursing , computer science , telecommunications , statistics , environmental health , engineering , mechanical engineering , biochemistry , chemistry , mathematics , organic chemistry
Radiation therapy (RT), like many allied health professions, has lacked professional practice clarity, which until 2008 had not been comprehensively investigated. This manuscript describes the first phase of a three‐phase project investigating the current and future practices of radiation therapists ( RT s) in A ustralia. The aim of phase 1 was to define the practice of RT s in A ustralia. Methods A quantitative approach was used to gain an understanding of RT practice. A national survey was distributed to RT s in A ustralia. Descriptive statistics and content analysis were used to analyse the data. RT practice was analysed in relation to core and non‐core roles, where non‐core roles were further divided into basic and advanced practices. Results The data from the national survey were representative of the A ustralian RT population ( n = 525). The current practice of RT s is presented in summary tables for each area of work (treatment, planning, simulation, mould room and general). Conclusion This study provided clarification of RT practice and indicated there was a desire to relinquish administrative roles to focus on RT–specific practice. There was evidence that some advanced roles were currently practiced in Australia; however, there was no structure to support these roles and they were based only on local need. This study identified that the profession needs to consider how they will maintain core RT practice, while encouraging the development of new roles, and whether some roles need to be relinquished.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here