Premium
Magnetic Resonance Assessment of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction at Any Time Post‐Infarction for Prediction of Subsequent Events in a Large Multicenter STEMI Registry
Author(s) -
Gavara Jose,
MarcosGarces Victor,
LopezLereu Maria P.,
Monmeneu Jose V.,
RiosNavarro Cesar,
Dios Elena,
Perez Nerea,
Merenciano Hector,
Gabaldon Ana,
Cànoves Joaquim,
Racugno Paolo,
Bonanad Clara,
Minana Gema,
Nunez Julio,
Nunez Eduardo,
Moratal David,
Chorro Francisco J.,
Valente Filipa,
Lorenzatti Daniel,
RodríguezPalomares Jose F.,
OrtizPérez Jose T.,
Bodi Vicente
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
journal of magnetic resonance imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.563
H-Index - 160
eISSN - 1522-2586
pISSN - 1053-1807
DOI - 10.1002/jmri.27789
Subject(s) - mace , ejection fraction , medicine , cardiology , myocardial infarction , magnetic resonance imaging , heart failure , percutaneous coronary intervention , radiology
Background Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most accurate imaging technique for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) quantification, but as yet the prognostic value of LVEF assessment at any time after ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) for subsequent major adverse cardiac event (MACE) prediction is uncertain. Purpose To explore the prognostic impact of MRI‐derived LVEF at any time post‐STEMI to predict subsequent MACE (cardiovascular death or re‐admission for acute heart failure). Study Type Prospective. Population One thousand thirteen STEMI patients were included in a multicenter registry. Field Strength/Sequence 1.5‐T . Balanced steady‐state free precession (cine imaging) and segmented inversion recovery steady‐state free precession (late gadolinium enhancement) sequences. Assessment Post‐infarction MRI‐derived LVEF (reduced [r]: <40%; mid‐range [mr]: 40%–49%; preserved [p]: ≥50%) was sequentially quantified at 1 week and after >3 months of follow‐up. Statistical Tests Multi‐state Markov model to determine the prognostic value of each LVEF state (r‐, mr‐ or p‐) at any time point assessed to predict subsequent MACE. A P ‐value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results During a 6.2‐year median follow‐up, 105 MACE (10%) were registered. Transitions toward improved LVEF predominated and only r‐LVEF (at any time assessed) was significantly related to a higher incidence of subsequent MACE. The observed transitions from r‐LVEF, mr‐LVEF, and p‐LVEF states to MACE were: 15.3%, 6%, and 6.7%, respectively. Regarding the adjusted transition intensity ratios, patients in r‐LVEF state were 4.52‐fold more likely than those in mr‐LVEF state and 5.01‐fold more likely than those in p‐LVEF state to move to MACE state. Nevertheless, no significant differences were found in transitions from mr‐LVEF and p‐LVEF states to MACE state ( P ‐value = 0.6). Data Conclusion LVEF is an important MRI index for simple and dynamic post‐STEMI risk stratification. Detection of r‐LVEF by MRI at any time during follow‐up identifies a subset of patients at high risk of subsequent events. Level of Evidence 2 Technical Efficacy Stage 2