Premium
Radiomic Analysis of Native T 1 Mapping Images Discriminates Between MYH7 and MYBPC3 ‐Related Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Author(s) -
Wang Jie,
Yang Fuyao,
Liu Wentao,
Sun Jiayu,
Han Yuchi,
Li Dong,
Gkoutos Georgios V.,
Zhu Yanjie,
Chen Yucheng
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of magnetic resonance imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.563
H-Index - 160
eISSN - 1522-2586
pISSN - 1053-1807
DOI - 10.1002/jmri.27209
Subject(s) - myh7 , hypertrophic cardiomyopathy , receiver operating characteristic , sanger sequencing , mann–whitney u test , medicine , nuclear medicine , cardiology , biology , genetics , mutation , gene , gene isoform
Background The phenotype via conventional cardiac MRI analysis of MYH7 (β‐myosin heavy chain)‐ and MYBPC3 (β‐myosin‐binding protein C)‐associated hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) groups is similar. Few studies exist on the genotypic–phenotypic association as assessed by machine learning in HCM patients. Purpose To explore the phenotypic differences based on radiomics analysis of T 1 mapping images between MYH7 and MYBPC3 ‐associated HCM subgroups. Study Type Prospective observational study. Subjects In all, 102 HCM patients with pathogenic, or likely pathogenic mutation, in MYH7 ( n = 68) or MYBPC3 ( n = 34) genes. Field Strength/Sequence Cardiac MRI was performed at 3.0T with balanced steady‐state free precession (bSSFP), phase‐sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), and modified Look–Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) T 1 mapping sequences. Assessment All patients underwent next‐generation sequencing and Sanger genetic sequencing. Left ventricular native T 1 and LGE were analyzed. One hundred and fifty‐seven radiomic features were extracted and modeled using a support vector machine (SVM) combined with principal component analysis (PCA). Each subgroup was randomly split 4:1 (feature selection / test validation). Statistical Tests Mann–Whitney U ‐tests and Student's t ‐tests were performed to assess differences between subgroups. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to assess the model's ability to stratify patients based on radiomic features. Results There were no significant differences between MYH7 ‐ and MYBPC3 ‐associated HCM subgroups based on traditional native T 1 values (global, basal, and middle short‐axis slice native T 1 ; P = 0.760, 0.914, and 0.178, respectively). However, the SVM model combined with PCA achieved an accuracy and area under the curve (AUC) of 92.0% and 0.968 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.968–0.971), respectively. For the test validation dataset, the accuracy and AUC were 85.5% and 0.886 (95% CI: 0.881–0.901), respectively. Data Conclusion Radiomic analysis of native T 1 mapping images may be able to discriminate between MYH7 ‐ and MYBPC3 ‐associated HCM patients, exceeding the performance of conventional native T 1 values. Level of Evidence 3 Technical Efficacy Stage 2 J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2020;52:1714–1721.