z-logo
Premium
Fast myocardial T 1 mapping using shortened inversion recovery based schemes
Author(s) -
Huang Li,
Neji Radhouene,
Nazir Muhummad Sohaib,
Whitaker John,
Reid Fiona,
Bosio Filippo,
Chiribiri Amedeo,
Razavi Reza,
Roujol Sébastien
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of magnetic resonance imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.563
H-Index - 160
eISSN - 1522-2586
pISSN - 1053-1807
DOI - 10.1002/jmri.26649
Subject(s) - repeatability , wilcoxon signed rank test , imaging phantom , mathematics , nuclear medicine , statistics , pearson product moment correlation coefficient , medicine , mann–whitney u test
Background Myocardial T 1 mapping shows promise for assessment of cardiomyopathies. Most myocardial T 1 mapping techniques, such as modified Look–Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI), generate one T 1 map per breath‐held acquisition (9–17 heartbeats), which prolongs multislice protocols and may be unsuitable for patients with breath‐holding difficulties. Purpose To develop and characterize novel shortened inversion recovery based T 1 mapping schemes of 2–5 heartbeats. Study Type Prospective. Population/Phantom Numerical simulations, agarose/NiCl 2 phantom, 16 healthy volunteers, and 24 patients. Field Strength/Sequence 1.5T/MOLLI. Assessment All shortened T 1 mapping schemes were characterized and compared with a conventional MOLLI scheme (5‐(3)‐3) in terms of accuracy, precision, spatial variability, and repeatability. Statistical Tests Kruskal–Wallis, Wilcoxon rank sum tests, analysis of variance, Student's t ‐tests, Bland–Altman analysis, and Pearson correlation analysis. Results All shortened schemes provided limited T 1 time variations (≤2% for T 1 times ≤1200 msec) and limited penalty of precision (by a factor of ~1.4–1.5) when compared with MOLLI in numerical simulations. In phantom, differences between all schemes in terms of accuracy, spatial variability, and repeatability did not reach statistical significance ( P > 0.71). In healthy volunteers, there were no statistically significant differences between all schemes in terms of native T 1 times and repeatability for myocardium ( P = 0.21 and P = 0.87, respectively) and blood ( P = 0.79 and P = 0.41, respectively). All shortened schemes led to a limited increase of spatial variability for native myocardial T 1 mapping with respect to MOLLI (by a factor of 1.2) ( P < 0.0001). In both healthy volunteers and patients, the two‐heartbeat scheme and MOLLI led to highly linearly correlated T 1 times (correlation coefficients ≥0.83). Data Conclusion The proposed two‐heartbeat T 1 mapping scheme yields a 5‐fold acceleration compared with MOLLI, with highly linearly correlated T 1 times, no significant difference of repeatability, and limited spatial variability penalty at 1.5T. This approach may enable myocardial T 1 mapping in patients with severe breath‐holding difficulties and reduce the examination time of multislice protocols. Level of Evidence : 1 Technical Efficacy Stage : 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:641–654.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom