z-logo
Premium
Value of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Fractal Analysis Combined With Myocardial Strain in Discriminating Isolated Left Ventricular Noncompaction and Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Author(s) -
Zheng Tian,
Ma Xiaohai,
Li Shuhao,
Ueda Takuya,
Wang Zheng,
Lu Aijia,
Zhou Wei,
Zou Hongye,
Zhao Lei,
Gong Lianggeng
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of magnetic resonance imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.563
H-Index - 160
eISSN - 1522-2586
pISSN - 1053-1807
DOI - 10.1002/jmri.26616
Subject(s) - left ventricular noncompaction , receiver operating characteristic , cardiology , medicine , mann–whitney u test , dilated cardiomyopathy , cardiomyopathy , cardiac magnetic resonance , population , magnetic resonance imaging , fractal analysis , confidence interval , cardiac magnetic resonance imaging , nuclear medicine , heart failure , radiology , fractal dimension , fractal , mathematics , mathematical analysis , environmental health
Background Excessive trabeculation is present in isolated left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) and dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), which sometimes makes the differentiation between these two difficult. Fractal dimension (FD) is a unitless measure value of how completely the object fills space, which can assess the extent of myocardial trabeculae quantitatively. Purpose To compare the trabeculae features and myocardial strain derived from cardiac MR between LVNC and DCM. Study Type Respective case–control series. Population In all, 35 LVNC patients and 30 DCM patients were enrolled, and 20 healthy volunteers were selected as a control group. Field Strength/Sequence 5 T with 8‐channel phased‐array cardiac receiver coil including steady‐state free precession cine imaging. Assessment The degree of left ventricular trabeculation was evaluated by a semiautomatic tool based on fractal analysis. Myocardial deformation was assessed by feature tracking. Statistical Tests Independent samples Student's t ‐test, Mann–Whitney U ‐test, receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves, and Spearman's rank coefficient were conducted. Results Max apical FD and mean global FD were higher in the LVNC group than in the DCM group (1.433 ± 0.074 vs. 1.341 ± 0.062, P < 0.001; 1.323 ± 0.036 vs. 1.267 ± 0.041, P < 0.001, respectively). For diagnosing LVNC, max apical FD was 1.392 (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.881, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.804–0.957), and the cutoff value of mean global FD was 1.283 (AUC = 0.895, 95% CI: 0.828–0.961). The global peak longitudinal strain value of the left ventricle (GPLS) showed significant differences between the LVNC group and DCM group [–6.49 (–11.41, –4.90) vs. –4.61 (–5.87, –3.61), P = 0.006]. The diagnostic accuracy for LVNC is highest when using FDs in coordination with GPLS (AUC = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.86–0.98, P < 0.001). Data Conclusion Fractal analysis provides a quantitative measurement of myocardial trabeculation. The combination of fractal analysis with myocardial strain provides a novel biomarker in distinguishing LVNC from DCM. Level of Evidence : 3 Technical Efficacy Stage : 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:153–163.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here