z-logo
Premium
Correlation of quantitative pancreatic T 1 value and HbA1c value in subjects with normal and impaired glucose tolerance
Author(s) -
Noda Yoshifumi,
Goshima Satoshi,
Tsuji Yusuke,
Kajita Kimihiro,
Kawada Hiroshi,
Kawai Nobuyuki,
Tanahashi Yukichi,
Matsuo Masayuki
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of magnetic resonance imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.563
H-Index - 160
eISSN - 1522-2586
pISSN - 1053-1807
DOI - 10.1002/jmri.26242
Subject(s) - prediabetes , medicine , diabetes mellitus , receiver operating characteristic , impaired glucose tolerance , gastroenterology , prospective cohort study , type 2 diabetes mellitus , correlation , type 2 diabetes , endocrinology , mathematics , geometry
Background Signal intensity on T 1 ‐weighted images (T 1 WI) is associated with pancreatic fibrosis and HbA1c levels. Purpose To evaluate the feasibility of the pancreatic T 1 value for assessment of subjects with normal and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). Study Type A prospective single‐institution study. Population In all, 95 consecutive patients with a known or suspected pancreatic disease. Field Strength/Sequences 3T/fast pancreatic T 1 mapping using a modified Look–Locker sequence. Assessment Following the American Diabetes Association criteria, patients were classified into three groups, as follows: no‐diabetes subject, HbA1c < 5.7%; prediabetes, 5.7% ≤ HbA1c < 6.5%; and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), HbA1c ≥ 6.5%. Pancreatic T 1 value and signal intensity ratio (SIR = SI pancreas /SI muscle ) using T 1 WI were compared with the HbA1c values. Statistical Tests Quantitative data were assessed with one‐way analysis of variance, Fisher's and Mann–Whitney U tests, and receiver‐operating characteristic analysis. Results The pancreatic T 1 value was significantly longer in T2DM than in no‐diabetes and prediabetes subjects ( P  < 0.05) and was significantly longer in prediabetes than in no‐diabetes subjects ( P  < 0.05). The mean pancreatic T 1 value was significantly lower in the low‐value group (HbA1c < 5.7%) (906.3 msec) compared with the high‐value group (HbA1c ≥ 6.5%) (993.8 msec) ( P  < 0.0001). SIR on T 1 WI was significantly higher in the low‐value group compared with the high‐value group ( P  = 0.029). The sensitivities, specificities, and area under the receiver‐operating characteristic curve (AUCs) for differentiating the low‐ and high‐value groups were 74.1%, 83.8%, and 0.82 in the pancreatic T 1 values and 77.8%, 54.4%, and 0.63 in SIR on T 1 WI, respectively. The specificity ( P  < 0.0001) and AUC ( P  = 0.0020) were significantly higher in the pancreatic T 1 values than in SIR on T 1 WI. Data Conclusion Pancreatic T 1 value has the potential of being an imaging biomarker for the assessment of IGT. Level of Evidence: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:711–718.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom