z-logo
Premium
Tissue characterization of uterine fibroids with an intravoxel incoherent motion model: The need for T 2 correction
Author(s) -
Qu Feifei,
Hor PeiHerng,
Fischer John,
Muthupillai Raja
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
journal of magnetic resonance imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.563
H-Index - 160
eISSN - 1522-2586
pISSN - 1053-1807
DOI - 10.1002/jmri.25988
Subject(s) - intravoxel incoherent motion , uterine fibroids , perfusion , nuclear medicine , medicine , effective diffusion coefficient , magnetic resonance imaging , radiology , pathology
Background Diminished signal intensity of uterine fibroids in T 2 ‐weighted images is routinely used as a qualitative marker of fibroid hypoperfusion. However, quantitative classification of fibroid perfusion with intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) model‐based metrics is not yet clinically accepted. Purpose To investigate the influence of T 2 correction on the estimation of IVIM model parameters for characterizing uterine fibroid tissue. Study Type Prospective. Population Fourteen women with 41 fibroids (12 Type I and 29 Type II, per Funaki classification) underwent diffusion‐weighted imaging and T 2 mapping. Field Strength Diffusion‐weighted images ( b values: 0, 20, 40, 60, 100, 200, 400, 600, 800, 1000 s/mm 2 ) and T 2 maps were obtained at 1.5T. Assessment The effect of uterine fibroid T 2 variation on IVIM model parameters (diffusion coefficient, perfusion coefficient, and perfusion volume fraction) were numerically modeled and experimentally evaluated without ( D, D*, f ) and with ( D c ,D c * , f c ) T 2 correction. The relationship of T 2 with D and the T 2 ‐corrected perfusion volume fraction ( f c ) was also examined. Statistical Test D‐ values and f‐ values estimated with and without T 2 correction were compared by using a two‐tailed Student's t ‐test. Results Type II fibroids had higher D and f than Type I fibroids, but the differences were not significant (Type I vs. Type II, D : 0.83 ± 0.20 vs. 0.80 ± 0.25 mm 2 /s, P  = 0.78; f : 23.64 ± 4.87% vs. 25.27 ± 7.46%, P  = 0.49). For Type I and Type II fibroids, f c was lower than f , and f c of Type II fibroids was significantly higher than that of Type I fibroids (Type I vs. Type II, f c : 7.80 ± 1.88% vs. 11.82 ± 4.13%, P  = 0.003). Both D and f c exponentially increased with the increase of fibroid T 2 as functions:D c ( T 2 ) = − 1.52 × 10 − 3 ⋅ e − 3.42T 2290+ 1.84 × 10 − 3andf c ( T 2 ) = − 0.2336 ⋅ e − 3.217T 2290+ 0.2269 , respectively. D asymptotically approached 1.79 × 10 −3 mm 2 /s, and f c approached 21.74%. Data Conclusion T 2 correction is important when using IVIM‐based models to characterize uterine fibroid tissue. Level of Evidence : 2 Technical Efficacy : Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;48:994–1001.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom