z-logo
Premium
Magnetic resonance spin–spin relaxation time estimation in a rat model of fatty liver disease
Author(s) -
Alghamdi Sami,
Sinclair Benjamin,
Cowin Gary,
Brereton Ian,
Tesiram Yasvir A.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
journal of magnetic resonance imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.563
H-Index - 160
eISSN - 1522-2586
pISSN - 1053-1807
DOI - 10.1002/jmri.25786
Subject(s) - akaike information criterion , exponential function , magnetic resonance imaging , fatty liver , relaxation (psychology) , nuclear magnetic resonance , spin echo , choline , physics , mathematics , statistics , medicine , pathology , disease , mathematical analysis , radiology
Purpose To compare mono‐ and bi‐exponential relaxation model equations to discriminate between normal and fatty liver disease. Materials and Methods Six rats on a choline deficient amino acid modified (CDAA) diet and six on normal chow were studied. Multiple spin echo images with increasing echo times (TEs) were collected at 9.4T. Pixel‐wise T 2 maps were generated using mono‐exponential decay function to calculate T 2M , and a bi‐exponential to calculate, short T 2 component (T 2S ), long T 2 component (T 2L ), and fractions of these components ( ρ S , ρ L ), respectively. Statistical F‐tests and Akaike's information criterion (AIC) were used to assess the relative performance of the two models. Results F‐test and AIC showed that in the CDAA group, T 2 bi‐exponential model described the signal of T 2 weighted imaging of the liver better than the mono‐exponential model. Controls were best described by the mono‐exponential model. Mean values for T 2M , T 2L , T 2S , ρ S , ρ L were 31.2 ± 0.7 ms, 72.8 ± 3.3 ms, 8.2 ± 0.6 ms,71.2 ± 2.1%, 30.4 ± 1.3%, respectively, in CDAA rats, compared with 18.8 ± 0.5 ms, 32.3 ± 0.7 ms, 9.2 ± 1.8 ms, 79 ± 2%, 21.0 ± 1.1% in controls. Conclusion In the fatty liver of CDAA rats we have shown that T 2 weighted images fit the bi‐exponential model better than mono‐exponential decays thus providing a better description of the data. Level of Evidence: 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:468–476.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom