z-logo
Premium
High‐SNR multiple T 2 (*)‐contrast magnetic resonance imaging using a robust denoising method based on tissue characteristics
Author(s) -
Eo Taejoon,
Kim Taeseong,
Jun Yohan,
Lee Hongpyo,
Ahn Sung Soo,
Kim DongHyun,
Hwang Dosik
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of magnetic resonance imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.563
H-Index - 160
eISSN - 1522-2586
pISSN - 1053-1807
DOI - 10.1002/jmri.25477
Subject(s) - imaging phantom , noise reduction , filter (signal processing) , mean squared error , mathematics , signal to noise ratio (imaging) , image quality , pixel , noise (video) , artificial intelligence , magnetic resonance imaging , contrast (vision) , computer science , pattern recognition (psychology) , nuclear medicine , computer vision , image (mathematics) , medicine , statistics , radiology
Purpose To develop an effective method that can suppress noise in successive multiecho T 2 (*)‐weighted magnetic resonance (MR) brain images while preventing filtering artifacts. Materials and Methods For the simulation experiments, we used multiple T 2 ‐weighted images of an anatomical brain phantom. For in vivo experiments, successive multiecho MR brain images were acquired from five healthy subjects using a multiecho gradient‐recalled‐echo (MGRE) sequence with a 3T MRI system. Our denoising method is a nonlinear filter whose filtering weights are determined by tissue characteristics among pixels. The similarity of the tissue characteristics is measured based on the l 2 ‐difference between two temporal decay signals. Both numerical and subjective evaluations were performed in order to compare the effectiveness of our denoising method with those of conventional filters, including Gaussian low‐pass filter (LPF), anisotropic diffusion filter (ADF), and bilateral filter. Root‐mean‐square error (RMSE), signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR), and contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR) were used in the numerical evaluation. Five observers, including one radiologist, assessed the image quality and rated subjective scores in the subjective evaluation. Results Our denoising method significantly improves RMSE, SNR, and CNR of numerical phantom images, and CNR of in vivo brain images in comparison with conventional filters ( P < 0.005). It also receives the highest scores for structure conspicuity (8.2 to 9.4 out of 10) and naturalness (9.2 to 9.8 out of 10) among the conventional filters in the subjective evaluation. Conclusion This study demonstrates that high‐SNR multiple T 2 (*)‐contrast MR images can be obtained using our denoising method based on tissue characteristics without noticeable artifacts. Evidence level : 2 J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2017;45:1835–1845

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here