z-logo
Premium
New estimate of valvuloarterial impedance in aortic valve stenosis: A cardiac magnetic resonance study
Author(s) -
Soulat Gilles,
Kachenoura Nadjia,
Bollache Emilie,
Perdrix Ludivine,
Diebold Benoit,
Zhygalina Valentina,
Latremouille Christian,
Laurent Stephane,
Fabiani JeanNoel,
Mousseaux Elie
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of magnetic resonance imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.563
H-Index - 160
eISSN - 1522-2586
pISSN - 1053-1807
DOI - 10.1002/jmri.25399
Subject(s) - cardiology , medicine , afterload , ejection fraction , ventricle , stenosis , aortic valve , aortic valve stenosis , asymptomatic , magnetic resonance imaging , heart failure , radiology
Purpose Valvuloarterial impedance (Z VA ), estimating left ventricle (LV) afterload, has been proposed in transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) as a predictor of mortality in aortic valve stenosis (AVS). However, its calculation differs from arterial characteristic impedance (Z C ). Our aim was to apply the concept of Z C calculation to estimate Z VA from MR with carotid tonometry and to evaluate these indices through their associations with symptoms, LV diastolic function and aortic stiffness. Materials and Methods In 40 patients with AVS (76 ± 13 years), Z VA‐TI derived from velocity time integral and E/Ea were estimated by TTE. Z VA‐INS , based on Z C formula, calculated as the instantaneous pressure gradient to peak flow ratio and aortic compliance were estimated by using MRI at 1.5 Tesla. Results Both Z VA estimates were higher in symptomatic than asymptomatic patients (707 ± 22 versus 579 ± 53 dyne.s/cm 5 , P  = 0.031 for Z VA‐INS and 4.35 ± 0.16 versus 3.33 ± 0.38 mmHg.m 2 /mL, P  = 0.018 for Z VA‐TI ). Although they were both associated with aortic compliance (r = ‐0.45; P  = 0.006 for Z VA‐INS and r = ‐0.43; P  = 0.008 for Z VA‐TI ) only Z VA‐INS was associated with E/Ea (r = 0.50; P  < 0.001). In multivariate analysis to identify determinants of E/Ea, a model including age, mean blood pressure, LV ejection fraction, LV mass, and aortic valve area was performed (R 2  = 0.41; P  < 0.01). When Z VA‐INS was added to the model, its overall significance was higher R 2  = 0.56 ( P  < 0.01) and Z VA‐INS and LV mass were the only significant determinants. Conclusion Z VA‐INS was more strongly associated with diastolic dysfunction than usual parameters quantifying AVS severity. This new Z VA estimate could improve LV afterload evaluation. Level of Evidence: 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;45:795–803.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom