z-logo
Premium
Optimal combination of FLAIR and T2‐weighted MRI for improved lesion contrast in multiple sclerosis
Author(s) -
Gabr Refaat E.,
Hasan Khader M.,
Haque Muhammad E.,
Nelson Flavia M.,
Wolinsky Jerry S.,
Narayana Ponnada A.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of magnetic resonance imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.563
H-Index - 160
eISSN - 1522-2586
pISSN - 1053-1807
DOI - 10.1002/jmri.25281
Subject(s) - fluid attenuated inversion recovery , multiple sclerosis , nuclear medicine , magnetic resonance imaging , medicine , lesion , cerebrospinal fluid , contrast (vision) , radiology , pathology , computer science , artificial intelligence , psychiatry
Purpose Postacquisition combination of three‐dimensional T2‐weighted (T2w) and fluid‐attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images can improve the visualization of brain lesions in multiple sclerosis (MS). However, an optimal way to combine these images has not been described so far. The main objective of this study is to investigate an optimal combination of T2w and FLAIR to improve the conspicuity of MS lesions. Materials and Methods We determined the parameters for a generalized multiplicative image combination which maximize the contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR) between lesions and normal‐appearing brain tissue through simulations and verified experimentally. MRI data from 11 MS patients acquired at 3 Tesla were retrospectively analyzed using the proposed approach and compared with conventional FLAIR, and to images obtained by direct multiplication of T2w and FLAIR (FLAIR 2 ). Image quality was assessed by region‐of‐interest analysis. In addition, to evaluate the degree of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) suppression, CSF‐to‐gray matter (CSF/GM) ratio was calculated. Reduction in global image contrast was assessed by computing the reduction in the contrast of mid‐level intensity values. Results An optimal combination was found to be the third order expression: FLAIR 3 = FLAIR 1.55 × T2w 1.45 . Compared with FLAIR, the lesion CNR was significantly increased by 1.9× ( P < 0.005) and 2.5× ( P < 0.001) using FLAIR 2 and FLAIR 3 , respectively. CSF/GM ratio was increased by 1.7× in FLAIR 2 ( P < 0.001) compared with FLAIR, while it was reduced to 0.7× on FLAIR 3 ( P < 0.05). The mid‐intensity contrast was preserved on FLAIR 2 ( P = 0.2), and decreased by 29% on FLAIR 3 ( P < 0.001). Conclusion These results show that the optimized combination of FLAIR and T2w can improve MS lesion conspicuity. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;44:1293–1300.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here