Premium
Evaluation of interobserver variability and diagnostic performance of developed MRI‐based radiological scoring system for invasive placenta previa
Author(s) -
Ueno Yoshiko,
Maeda Tetsuo,
Tanaka Utaru,
Tanimura Kenji,
Kitajima Kazuhiro,
Suenaga Yuko,
Takahashi Satoru,
Yamada Hideto,
Sugimura Kazuro
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of magnetic resonance imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.563
H-Index - 160
eISSN - 1522-2586
pISSN - 1053-1807
DOI - 10.1002/jmri.25184
Subject(s) - radiological weapon , placenta previa , medicine , radiology , scoring system , medical physics , pregnancy , placenta , surgery , biology , fetus , genetics
Purpose To evaluate the interobserver variability and diagnostic performance of a developed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)‐based scoring system for invasive placenta previa. Materials and Methods Prenatal MR images of 70 women were retrospectively evaluated, 18 of whom were diagnosed with invasive placenta. The six MR features (dark band on T 2 ‐weighted images, intraplacental abnormal vascularity, placental bulge, heterogeneous placenta, myometrial thinning, and placental protrusion sign) were scored on 5‐point Likert scale separately, and the cumulative radiological score (CRS) was defined as the sum of each score. Two more experienced radiologists (readers A and B) and two less experienced residents (readers C and D) calculated the CRS. Interobserver variability was assessed by measuring the intraclass correlation coefficient. Diagnostic performance was evaluated by means of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results Interobserver variability for CRS was excellent for the more experienced radiologists (0.85), and good for all readers (0.72) and the less experienced residents (0.66). The area under the ROC curve (Az) and accuracy (Acc) for CRS were significantly higher or equivalent to those of other MR features for all readers (Az and Acc for reader A; CRS, 0.92, 91.4%; intraplacental T 2 dark band, 0.83, P = 0.009, 81.4%, P = 0.03; intraplacental abnormal vascularity, 0.9, P = 0.3, 90.0%, P = 1.00; placental bulge, 0.81, P = 0.0008, 80.0%, P = 0.02; heterogeneous placenta, 0.85, P = 0.11, 74.3%, P = 0.002; myometrial thinning, 0.84, P = 0.06, 60.0%, P < 0.0001; placental protrusion sign, 0.81, P = 0.01, 81.4%, P = 0.26). Conclusion This developed MRI‐based scoring system demonstrated excellent or good interobserver variability, and good diagnostic performance for invasive placenta previa. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;44:573–583.