Premium
3 Tesla high‐resolution and delayed gadolinium enhanced MR imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC) after autologous chondrocyte transplantation in the hip
Author(s) -
Lazik Andrea,
Körsmeier Konrad,
Claßen Tim,
Jäger Marcus,
Kamminga Michael,
Kraff Oliver,
Lauenstein Thomas C.,
Theysohn Jens M.,
Landgraeber Stefan
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
journal of magnetic resonance imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.563
H-Index - 160
eISSN - 1522-2586
pISSN - 1053-1807
DOI - 10.1002/jmri.24821
Subject(s) - medicine , cartilage , transplantation , coronal plane , intraclass correlation , magnetic resonance imaging , nuclear medicine , cartilage damage , radiology , osteoarthritis , surgery , articular cartilage , anatomy , pathology , clinical psychology , alternative medicine , psychometrics
Background To evaluate the feasibility of 3 Tesla (T) high‐resolution and gadolinium enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) in the thin and rounded hip cartilage of patients after acetabular matrix‐based autologous chondrocyte transplantation (MACT). Methods Under general ethics approval, 24 patients were prospectively examined 6–31 months after acetabular MACT at 3T using high‐resolution proton‐density weighted (PDw) images (bilateral PD SPACE, 0.8 mm isotropic; unilateral PD‐TSE coronal/sagittal, 0.8 × 0.8 resp. 0.5 × 0.5 × 2.5 mm) as well as T1 mapping (3D‐FLASH, 0.78 mm isotropic) in dGEMRIC technique, and clinically scored. The cartilage transplant was evaluated using an adapted MOCART score (maximum 85 points). T1 relaxation times were measured independently by two radiologists. Here, regions of interest were placed manually in automatically calculated relaxation‐maps, both in the transplant and adjacent healthy cartilage regions. Interobserver reliability was estimated by means of intraclass‐correlation (ICC). Results The transplant was morphologically definable in the PDw images of 23 patients with a mean MOCART score of 69 points (60–80 points, SD 6.5). T1 maps showed a clear differentiation between acetabular and femoral cartilage, but correlation with PDw images was necessary to identify the transplant. Mean T1 relaxation times of the transplant were 616.3 ms (observer 1) resp. 610.1 ms (observer 2), and of adjacent healthy acetabular cartilage 574.5 ms (observer 1) resp. 604.9 ms (observer 2). Interobserver reliability of the relaxation times in the transplant was excellent (ICC‐coefficient 0.88) and in adjacent healthy regions good (0.77). Conclusion High‐resolution PDw imaging with adapted MOCART scoring and dGEMRIC is feasible after MACT in the thin and rounded hip cartilage. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2015;42:624–633.